Clinical Validation and Post-Implementation Performance Monitoring of a Neural Network-Assisted Approach for Detecting Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Minimal Residual Disease by Flow Cytometry.

Journal: Cancers
Published Date:

Abstract

: Flow cytometric detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is complex, time-consuming, and subject to inter-operator variability. Deep neural networks (DNNs) offer potential for standardization and efficiency improvement, but require rigorous validation and monitoring for safe clinical implementation. : We evaluated a DNN-assisted human-in-the-loop approach for CLL MRD detection. Initial validation included method comparison against manual analysis (n = 240), precision studies, and analytical sensitivity verification. Post-implementation monitoring comprised four components: daily electronic quality control, input data drift detection, error analysis, and attribute acceptance sampling. Laboratory efficiency was assessed through a timing study of 161 cases analyzed by five technologists. : Method comparison demonstrated 97.5% concordance with manual analysis for qualitative classification (sensitivity 100%, specificity 95%) and excellent correlation for quantitative assessment (r = 0.99, Deming slope = 0.99). Precision studies confirmed high repeatability and within-laboratory precision across multiple operators. Analytical sensitivity was verified at 0.002% MRD. Post-implementation monitoring identified 2.97% of cases (26/874) with input data drift, primarily high-burden CLL and non-CLL neoplasms. Error analysis showed the DNN alone achieved 97% sensitivity compared to human-in-the-loop-reviewed results, with 13 missed cases (1.5%) showing atypical immunophenotypes. Attribute acceptance sampling confirmed 98.8% of reported negative cases were true negatives. The DNN-assisted workflow reduced average analysis time by 60.3% compared to manual analysis (4.2 ± 2.3 vs. 10.5 ± 5.8 min). : The implementation of a DNN-assisted approach for CLL MRD detection in a clinical laboratory provides diagnostic performance equivalent to expert manual analysis while substantially reducing analysis time. Comprehensive performance monitoring ensures ongoing safety and effectiveness in routine clinical practice. This approach provides a model for responsible AI integration in clinical laboratories, balancing automation benefits with expert oversight.

Authors

  • Jansen N Seheult
    The Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, and Vitalant Specialty Labs, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Seheult).
  • Gregory E Otteson
    Cell Kinetics Laboratory, DLMP, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
  • Matthew J Weybright
    Cell Kinetics Laboratory, DLMP, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
  • Michael M Timm
    Cell Kinetics Laboratory, DLMP, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
  • Wenchao Han
    Baines Imaging Research Laboratory, London Regional Cancer Program, London, Ontario, Canada. whan25@uwo.ca.
  • Dragan Jevremovic
    Cell Kinetics Laboratory, DLMP, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
  • Pedro Horna
    Cell Kinetics Laboratory, DLMP, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
  • Horatiu Olteanu
    Cell Kinetics Laboratory, DLMP, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
  • Min Shi
    School of Education, Fuzhou University of International Studies and Trade, 350000, China.

Keywords

No keywords available for this article.