Optimizing Attenuation Correction in Ga-PSMA PET Imaging Using Deep Learning and Artifact-Free Dataset Refinement.

Journal: Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)
Published Date:

Abstract

Attenuation correction (AC) is essential for achieving quantitatively accurate PET imaging. In Ga-PSMA PET, however, artifacts such as respiratory motion, halo effects, and truncation errors in CT-based AC (CT-AC) images compromise image quality and impair model training for deep learning-based AC. This study proposes a novel artifact-refinement framework that filters out corrupted PET-CT images to create a clean dataset for training an image-domain AC model, eliminating the need for anatomical reference scans. A residual neural network (ResNet) was trained using paired PET non-AC and PET CT-AC images from a dataset of 828 whole-body Ga-PSMA PET-CT scans. An initial model was trained using all data and employed to identify artifact-affected samples via voxel-level error metrics. These outliers were excluded, and the refined dataset was used to retrain the model with an L2 loss function. Performance was evaluated using metrics including mean error (ME), mean absolute error (MAE), relative error (RE%), RMSE, and SSIM on both internal and external test datasets. The model trained with the artifact-free dataset demonstrated significantly improved performance: ME = -0.009 ± 0.43 SUV, MAE = 0.09 ± 0.41 SUV, and SSIM = 0.96 ± 0.03. Compared to the model trained on unfiltered data, the purified data model showed enhanced quantitative accuracy and robustness in external validation. The proposed data purification framework significantly enhances the performance of deep learning-based AC for Ga-PSMA PET by mitigating artifact-induced errors. This approach facilitates reliable PET imaging in the absence of anatomical references, advancing clinical applicability and image fidelity.

Authors

  • Masoumeh Dorri Giv
    Nuclear Medicine Research Center, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ghaem Hospital, Mashhad University of Medical Science, Mashhad, Iran, .
  • Guluzar Ozbolat
    Faculty of Health Science, Sinop University, Sinop 57000, Turkey.
  • Hossein Arabi
    Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Geneva University Hospital, CH-1211, Geneva 4, Switzerland.
  • Somayeh Malmir
    Department of Physics, Payame Noor University, Tehran 193954697, Iran.
  • Shahrokh Naseri
    Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Science, Mashhad, .
  • Vahid Roshan Ravan
    Nuclear Medicine Research Center, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ghaem Hospital, Mashhad University of Medical Science, Mashhad 6541747187, Iran.
  • Hossein Akbari-Lalimi
    Department of Medical Physics and Radiology, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Gonabad University of Medical Sciences, Gonabad 8317785741, Iran.
  • Raheleh Tabari Juybari
    Department of Radiology Technology, Behbahan Faculty of Medical Science, Behbahan 6361796819, Iran.
  • Ghasem Ali Divband
    Department of Nuclear Medicine, Jam Hospital, Tehran 1588657915, Iran.
  • Nasrin Raeisi
    Nuclear Medicine Research Center, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ghaem Hospital, Mashhad University of Medical Science, Mashhad, Iran, .
  • Vahid Reza Dabbagh Kakhki
    Nuclear Medicine Research Center, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ghaem Hospital, Mashhad University of Medical Science, Mashhad, Iran, .
  • Emran Askari
    Nuclear Medicine Research Center, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ghaem Hospital, Mashhad University of Medical Science, Mashhad, Iran, .
  • Sara Harsini
    Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, BC Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1L3, Canada.

Keywords

No keywords available for this article.