Development of an anomaly detection system for Gibbs artifact identification in amyloid PET imaging.

Journal: Radiological physics and technology
Published Date:

Abstract

The PET Imaging Site Qualification Program for amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) in Japan includes visual evaluation of the cylinder phantom. This visual evaluation requires observation of the entire image of the phantom and confirmation of the absence of apparent artifacts. Because the evaluation is visually performed, inter-observer differences might exist among evaluators for difficult cases. Therefore, the workload of the staff who perform approval tasks must be reduced, and objective evaluation methods are needed. Thus, we attempted to develop an artificial-intelligence-based objective method for anomaly detection. Three artificial intelligence methods for anomaly detection were developed, and their accuracy was evaluated using AutoEncoder, AnoGAN, and a method combining feature extraction using AlexNet and a one-class support vector machine. In total, 10,207 normal images from 128 facilities and 594 abnormal images from eight facilities, all of which were submitted as part of application for amyloid PET certification, were used. Group five-fold cross-validation was employed for artificial intelligence training and evaluation. In addition, the performance of each artificial intelligence method was assessed using receiver operating characteristic analysis. The areas under the curve for anomaly detection using AutoEncoder, AnoGAN, and the method combining feature extraction using AlexNet and a one-class support vector machine were 0.80 ± 0.04, 0.77 ± 0.03, and 0.99 ± 0.01, respectively. Artificial intelligence effectively distinguished between normal and abnormal images with high accuracy. In the future, its practical implementation is anticipated to reduce the workload in the approval work for the Japanese site qualification program for amyloid PET.

Authors

  • Mitsuru Sato
    Department of Radiological Technology, School of Health Sciences, Niigata University, 2-746 Asahimachi-dori, Chuo-ku, Niigata, Niigata, 951-8518, Japan. mitu-sato@clg.niigata-u.ac.jp.
  • Hiromitsu Daisaki
    Graduate School of Radiological Technology, Gunma Prefectural College of Health Sciences, 323-1 Kamioki-machi, Maebashi, Gunma 371-0052 Japan.
  • Haruyuki Watanabe
    Department of Radiological Technology, Gunma Prefectural College of Health Sciences, Maebashi, Japan.
  • Saaya Isogai
    Department of Radiological Technology, Gunma Prefectural College of Health Sciences, 323-1, Kamioki-Machi, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan.
  • Manami Shiga
    Department of Radiological Technology, Gunma Prefectural College of Health Sciences, 323-1, Kamioki-Machi, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan.
  • Yasuhiko Ikari
    JSNM PET Imaging Site Qualification Program (J-PEQi), Tokyo, Japan.
  • Keisuke Tsuda
    JSNM PET Imaging Site Qualification Program (J-PEQi), Tokyo, Japan.
  • Kenji Hirata
    Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
  • Ukihide Tateishi
    Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Hospital, 1-5-45, Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8501, Japan.
  • Kazuaki Mori
    Adaptive Robotics Laboratory, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
  • Makoto Hosono
    JSNM PET Imaging Site Qualification Program (J-PEQi), Tokyo, Japan.
  • Hirofumi Fujii
    JSNM PET Imaging Site Qualification Program (J-PEQi), Tokyo, Japan.

Keywords

No keywords available for this article.