Intravascular Lithotripsy Versus Rotational Atherectomy for Calcified Coronary Lesions: A Systematic Review and an Updated Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes.
Journal:
Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions
Published Date:
May 12, 2025
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Severe coronary artery calcification (CAC) remains a significant challenge in interventional cardiology, especially in elderly and comorbid patients, such as diabetes or chronic kidney disease. CAC often leads to complications such as stent thrombosis and restenosis, therefore leading to bad clinical outcomes and increased major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) rates. Traditional approaches, including rotational atherectomy (RA), are commonly used to treat calcified plaques; however, are limited by procedural complexity, length of procedures, and risk of vascular injury. In contrast, intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) has emerged as a novel therapy using acoustic pressure waves to break calcified plaques with minimal vascular trauma. Despite its increasing use, direct comparisons between IVD and RA in the context of severe CAC are scant and leave critical evidence gaps for therapy optimization. This study compares IVL and RA outcomes to improve strategies for severe CAC management.
Authors
Keywords
No keywords available for this article.