Stomata morphology measurement with interactive machine learning: accuracy, speed, and biological relevance?

Journal: Plant methods
Published Date:

Abstract

Stomatal morphology plays a critical role in regulating plant gas exchange influencing water use efficiency and ecological adaptability. While traditional methods for analyzing stomatal traits rely on labor-intensive manual measurements, machine learning (ML) tools offer a promising alternative. In this study, we evaluate the suitability of a U-Net-based interactive ML software with corrective annotation for stomatal morphology phenotyping. The approach enables non-ML experts to efficiently segment stomatal structures across diverse datasets, including images from different plant species, magnifications, and imprint methods. We trained a single model based on images from five datasets and tested its performance on unseen data, achieving high accuracy for stomatal density (R = 0.98) and size (R = 0.90). Thresholding approaches applied to the U-Net segmentations further improved accuracy, particularly for density measurements. Despite significant variability between datasets, our findings demonstrate the feasibility of training a single segmentation model to analyze diverse stomatal data sets. Validation approaches showed that a semi-automatic approach involving correcting segmentations was five times faster than manual annotation while maintaining comparable accuracy. Our results also illustrate that ML metrics, such as the F1 score, correlate with accuracy in the statistical analysis of trait measurements with improvements diminishing after 2:30 h model training. The final model achieved high precision, allowing the detection of highly significant biological differences in stomatal morphology within plant, between genotypes and across growing environments. This study highlights interactive ML with corrective annotation as a robust and accessible tool for accelerating phenotyping in plant sciences, reducing technical barriers and promoting high-throughput analysis.

Authors

  • Tomke S Wacker
    Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. tsw@plen.ku.dk.
  • Abraham G Smith
    Department of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Signe M Jensen
    Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Theresa Pflüger
    Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Viktor G Hertz
    Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Eva Rosenqvist
    Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Fulai Liu
    Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Dorte B Dresbøll
    Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Keywords

No keywords available for this article.