Post-hoc eXplainable AI methods for analyzing medical images of gliomas (- A review for clinical applications).

Journal: Computers in biology and medicine
Published Date:

Abstract

Deep learning (DL) has shown promise in glioma imaging tasks using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and histopathology images, yet their complexity demands greater transparency in artificial intelligence (AI) systems. This is noticeable when users must understand the model output for a clinical application. In this systematic review, 65 post-hoc eXplainable AI (XAI), or interpretable AI studies, have been reviewed that provide an understanding of why a system generated a given output for tasks related to glioma imaging. A framework of post-hoc XAI methods, such as Gradient-based XAI (G-XAI) and Perturbation-based XAI (P-XAI), is introduced to evaluate deep models and explain their application in gliomas. The papers on XAI techniques in gliomas are surveyed and categorized by their specific aims such as grading, genetic biomarker detection, localization, intra-tumoral heterogeneity assessment, and survival analysis, and their XAI approach. This review highlights the growing integration of XAI in glioma imaging, demonstrating their role in bridging AI decision-making and medical diagnostics. The co-occurrence analysis emphasizes their role in enhancing model transparency and trust and guiding future research toward more reliable clinical applications. Finally, the current challenges associated with DL and XAI approaches and their clinical integration are discussed with an outlook on future opportunities from clinical users' perspectives and upcoming trends in XAI.

Authors

  • Hamail Ayaz
    Center for Precision Engineering, Materials and Manufacturing Research (PEM), Faculty of Engineering and Design, Atlantic Technological university, F91 YW50, Sligo, Ireland; MathematicalesModelling and Intelligent Systems for Health and Environment (MISHE), Faculty of Engineering and Design, Atlantic Technological University, Sligo, Ireland; Faculty of Engineering and Design, Atlantic Technological University, F91 YW50, Sligo, Ireland.
  • Esra Sümer-Arpak
    Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Boğaziçi University, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Esin Ozturk-Isik
    Biomedical Engineering Institute, Boğaziçi University, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Thomas C Booth
    School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
  • David Tormey
    Center for Precision Engineering, Materials and Manufacturing Research (PEM), Faculty of Engineering and Design, Atlantic Technological university, F91 YW50, Sligo, Ireland; Faculty of Engineering and Design, Atlantic Technological University, F91 YW50, Sligo, Ireland.
  • Ian McLoughlin
    School of Computing, The University of Kent, Medway, Kent, United Kingdom.
  • Saritha Unnikrishnan
    Faculty of Engineering & Design, Atlantic Technological University (ATU), Ash Ln, Ballytivnan, Sligo, F91 YW50, Ireland; Center of Precision Engineering, Materials and Manufacturing Research (PEM), Atlantic Technological University (ATU), Sligo, Ireland. Electronic address: saritha.unnikrishnan@atu.ie.

Keywords

No keywords available for this article.