First-Person Plural (Versus Singular) Pronoun Use Is Linked to Greater Perception of AI Threat.

Journal: Personality & social psychology bulletin
Published Date:

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) brings immediate benefits but also raises potential risks. Despite much discussion on AI threat, how subtle linguistic cues, such as first-person pronouns, influence its perception remains unclear. Proposing a scope-expansion perspective, we examine whether "we" versus "I" pronoun use increases perceived AI threat by broadening regulatory scope, particularly when AI threat is psychologically distant. Analyses of two large AI-related text corpora (Studies 1A and 1B) and four experiments ( = 1,451) revealed that using "we" versus "I" pronouns positively predicted and heightened perceived AI threat among English (Studies 1-4) and Chinese (Studies 3 and 5) speakers. This effect, explained by a broader regulatory scope (Studies 3 and 5), was stronger for psychologically distant (vs. close) AI threat (Studies 4 and 5) and among English (vs. Chinese) speakers (Study 3). These findings expand the role of first-person pronouns and enhance our understanding of public perceptions of AI threat.

Authors

  • Chao Li
    McGill University Health Centre, McGill Adult Unit for Congenital Heart Disease Excellence, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
  • Jianning Dang
    Beijing Key Laboratory of Applied Experimental Psychology, National Demonstration Center for Experimental Psychology Education (Beijing Normal University), Faculty of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China. Electronic address: jndang@bnu.edu.cn.
  • Li Liu
    Metanotitia Inc., Shenzhen, China.

Keywords

No keywords available for this article.