A Novel Generative Multi-Task Representation Learning Approach for Predicting Postoperative Complications in Cardiac Surgery Patients
Journal:
arXiv
Published Date:
Dec 2, 2024
Abstract
Early detection of surgical complications allows for timely therapy and
proactive risk mitigation. Machine learning (ML) can be leveraged to identify
and predict patient risks for postoperative complications. We developed and
validated the effectiveness of predicting postoperative complications using a
novel surgical Variational Autoencoder (surgVAE) that uncovers intrinsic
patterns via cross-task and cross-cohort presentation learning. This
retrospective cohort study used data from the electronic health records of
adult surgical patients over four years (2018 - 2021). Six key postoperative
complications for cardiac surgery were assessed: acute kidney injury, atrial
fibrillation, cardiac arrest, deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, blood
transfusion, and other intraoperative cardiac events. We compared prediction
performances of surgVAE against widely-used ML models and advanced
representation learning and generative models under 5-fold cross-validation.
89,246 surgeries (49% male, median (IQR) age: 57 (45-69)) were included, with
6,502 in the targeted cardiac surgery cohort (61% male, median (IQR) age: 60
(53-70)). surgVAE demonstrated superior performance over existing ML solutions
across all postoperative complications of cardiac surgery patients, achieving
macro-averaged AUPRC of 0.409 and macro-averaged AUROC of 0.831, which were
3.4% and 3.7% higher, respectively, than the best alternative method (by AUPRC
scores). Model interpretation using Integrated Gradients highlighted key risk
factors based on preoperative variable importance. surgVAE showed excellent
discriminatory performance for predicting postoperative complications and
addressing the challenges of data complexity, small cohort sizes, and
low-frequency positive events. surgVAE enables data-driven predictions of
patient risks and prognosis while enhancing the interpretability of patient
risk profiles.