Artificial Intelligence for Materials Discovery, Development, and Optimization.

Journal: ACS nano
Published Date:

Abstract

This review highlights the recent transformative impact of artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning (ML), and deep learning (DL) on materials science, emphasizing their applications in materials discovery, development, and optimization. AI-driven methods have revolutionized materials discovery through structure generation, property prediction, high-throughput (HT) screening, and computational design while advancing development with improved characterization and autonomous experimentation. Optimization has also benefited from AI's ability to enhance materials design and processes. The review will introduce fundamental AI and ML concepts, including supervised learning, unsupervised learning, semi-supervised learning, and reinforcement learning (RL), alongside advanced DL models such as recurrent neural networks (RNNs), convolutional neural networks (CNNs), graph neural networks (GNNs), generative models, and Transformer-based models, which are critical for analyzing complex material data sets. It also covers core topics in materials informatics, including structure-property relationships, material descriptors, quantitative structure-property relationships (QSPR), and strategies for managing missing data and small data sets. Despite these advancements, challenges such as inconsistent data quality, limited model interpretability, and a lack of standardized data-sharing frameworks persist. Future efforts will focus on improving robustness, integrating causal reasoning and physics-informed AI, and leveraging multimodal models to enhance scalability and transparency, unlocking new opportunities for more advanced materials discovery, development, and optimization. Furthermore, the integration of quantum computing with AI will enable faster and more accurate results, and ethical frameworks will ensure responsible human-AI collaboration, addressing concerns of bias, transparency, and accountability in decision-making.

Authors

  • Benediktus Madika
    Department of Materials Science and Engineering, KAIST, Daejeon 34141, Korea.
  • Aditi Saha
    Department of Materials Science and Engineering, KAIST, Daejeon 34141, Korea.
  • Chaeyul Kang
    Department of Materials Science and Engineering, KAIST, Daejeon 34141, Korea.
  • Batzorig Buyantogtokh
    Department of Materials Science and Engineering, KAIST, Daejeon 34141, Korea.
  • Joshua Agar
    Department of Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics, Drexel University, 3141 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States.
  • Chris M Wolverton
    Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208, United States.
  • Peter Voorhees
    Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208, United States.
  • Peter Littlewood
    School of Physics and Astronomy, University of St Andrews, St Andrews KY16 9SS, United Kingdom.
  • Sergei Kalinin
    Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, United States.
  • Seungbum Hong
    Department of Materials Science and Engineering, KAIST, Daejeon 34141, Korea.

Keywords

No keywords available for this article.