Fusion of Various Optimization Based Feature Smoothing Methods for Wearable and Non-invasive Blood Glucose Estimation
Journal:
arXiv
Published Date:
Mar 6, 2025
Abstract
Recently, the wearable and non-invasive blood glucose estimation approach has
been proposed. However, due to the unreliability of the acquisition device, the
presence of the noise and the variations of the acquisition environments, the
obtained features and the reference blood glucose values are highly unreliable.
To address this issue, this paper proposes a polynomial fitting approach to
smooth the obtained features or the reference blood glucose values. First, the
blood glucose values are estimated based on the individual optimization
approaches. Second, the absolute difference values between the estimated blood
glucose values and the actual blood glucose values based on each optimization
approach are computed. Third, these absolute difference values for each
optimization approach are sorted in the ascending order. Fourth, for each
sorted blood glucose value, the optimization method corresponding to the
minimum absolute difference value is selected. Fifth, the accumulate
probability of each selected optimization method is computed. If the accumulate
probability of any selected optimization method at a point is greater than a
threshold value, then the accumulate probabilities of these three selected
optimization methods at that point are reset to zero. A range of the sorted
blood glucose values are defined as that with the corresponding boundaries
points being the previous reset point and this reset point. Hence, after
performing the above procedures for all the sorted reference blood glucose
values in the validation set, the regions of the sorted reference blood glucose
values and the corresponding optimization methods in these regions are
determined. The computer numerical simulation results show that our proposed
method yields the mean absolute relative deviation (MARD) at 0.0930 and the
percentage of the test data falling in the zone A of the Clarke error grid at
94.1176%.