Robotic-assisted laparoscopic colpectomy combined with a hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy versus a vaginal colpectomy in trans masculine individuals.

Journal: International journal of transgender health
Published Date:

Abstract

Colpectomy entails the surgical removal of the vaginal epithelium. It may be performed in trans-masculine individuals as gender-affirming surgery. Vaginal colpectomy is a complex procedure with potentially severe complications. As alternative, robotic-assisted laparoscopic colpectomy combined with robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy and possible bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (RAC+) can be performed. To compare surgical outcomes of robotic-assisted colpectomy combined with a hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with a vaginal colpectomy after previous hysterectomy in trans masculine patients. A single-center retrospective cohort study included 310 transgender men who underwent either robotic-assisted colpectomy combined with a hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (RAC+) ( = 140) or vaginal colpectomy ( = 170) between January 2006 and December 2019. Surgical details and clinical outcomes were collected from all patients. The median intra-operative blood loss was 100 mL (50-200) in RAC + and 300 mL (200-450) in vaginal colpectomy ( < 0.01). The median duration of hospital stay was 2 days (1-2) in the RAC + group and 3 days (2-4) in the vaginal group ( < 0.01). In the RAC + group 63 (45%) peri-operative complications were reported, compared to 93 (54.7%) in the vaginal group [OR 0.7 (0.4-1.1)]. The main difference was found in intra-operative complications (RAC+ 0.7% vaginal 10.6%). Furthermore, the total number of complications graded 3a and higher was significantly lower in the RAC + group [OR 0.3 (0.2-0.7)]. Although RAC + entailed a more extensive procedure, compared to vaginal colpectomy, RAC + had a lower risk of severe peri-operative complications, requiring re-intervention; intra-operative blood loss was lower and hospital stay shorter. Both routes of colpectomy are complex procedures with potentially severe complications. Future studies are needed to study whether robot-colpectomy could be a safe alternative to vaginal colpectomy in patients with a previous hysterectomy.

Authors

  • Charlotte Nikkels
    Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  • Asra Vestering
    Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  • Judith A F Huirne
    Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  • Robert A de Leeuw
    Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  • Norah M van Mello
    Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  • Freek A Groenman
    Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Keywords

No keywords available for this article.