Development and validation of a machine learning model for accurate detection of wrong blood in tube errors in hospitalized patients.
Journal:
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine
Published Date:
Oct 29, 2025
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To develop and validate a machine-learning model based on routinely available biochemical and hematological parameters for detecting wrong blood in tube (WBIT) errors in hospitalized patients. METHODS: A retrospective multicenter study including one internal cohort (IC) and two external validation cohorts (EVC, EVC2). The IC was balanced (50 % correct, 50 % WBIT; 25 % real, 25 % simulated), while EVC (n=800) and EVC2 (n=460) represented more realistic scenarios (95 % correct, 5 % WBIT; equally distributed between real and simulated). Parameters present in ≥ 95 % of requests were selected, and their normalized variation from the immediately preceding result was calculated. The IC was divided into a training set (IC-TS, n=324) and an internal validation set (IC-VS, n=108). Feature selection was refined with Elastic Net before training an XGBoost model. Performance was assessed in IC-VS, EVC, and EVC2. For benchmarking, the model's discriminative ability was also compared with a multivariate Mahalanobis-based approach and with univariate delta checks within IC-TS/IC-VS. RESULTS: Sixteen of 25 candidate variables were retained. The model achieved ROC-AUC values of 0.98-0.99 and PR-AUC values of 0.93-0.99 across all validation cohorts. Recalibration improved positive predictive value and net benefit by reducing false positives, with a slight decrease in sensitivity, although all values remained ≥90 %. Specificities ranged from 98 to 99 %. The model consistently outperformed both the multivariate Mahalanobis approach and univariate delta checks within the internal cohort. CONCLUSIONS: This machine-learning model, leveraging widely available routine laboratory parameters, shows strong potential for integration into clinical workflows, enhancing WBIT detection and improving patient safety.
Authors
Keywords
No keywords available for this article.
