Diagnostic performance of X-ray-based deep learning models for detecting ankle and foot fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Journal:
Skeletal radiology
Published Date:
Nov 19, 2025
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Lower extremity fractures are prevalent in vulnerable populations leading to significant burdens, which highlight the need for timely and precise diagnosis. Integrating deep learning with imaging findings has shown promising results for enhancing fracture detection accuracy. This study assesses the diagnostic accuracy of AI models using X-ray images to detect ankle and foot fractures and investigates the probable factors influencing their performance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive search of four databases was done up to September 30th, 2025. Studies that investigated the accuracy of deep learning models for the detection of ankle and foot fractures utilizing X-rays were included. A bivariate random-effects model was used to perform meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 506 studies were reviewed, and 14 were included in the meta-analysis. Analysis of all the representative models of the included studies had a cumulative sensitivity and specificity of 93.2% and 94.5% (95% CI 88.8-95.9%, 90.1-97.0%, respectively, I2 6.6%). The pooled F1 score was estimated at 0.94 (95% CI 0.88-0.97). Subgroup analysis revealed no difference in the sensitivity or specificity of studies using multi-view vs. single-view X-rays (P = 0.64, P = 0.89, respectively). Models detecting calcaneal fractures performed significantly better than models detecting foot or ankle fractures, with a pooled sensitivity of 95.1% (95% CI 93.0-96.6%, P = 0.008), specificity of 98.3% (95% CI 97.00-99.0%), and a DOR of 1751.8 (95% CI 445.9-6882.5). The type of dataset used (validation vs. test, internal testing vs. external testing) did not significantly affect performance. CONCLUSION: Deep learning models can be considered a notably accurate method for the detection of ankle and foot fractures. Further studies with larger samples, external validation, and clinical implementations are required. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: This systematic review and meta-analysis study was registered with PROSPERO, registration number CRD42024624044.
Authors
Keywords
No keywords available for this article.
