Proteomics as a Theranostic Compass in BCR::ABL1-Negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Integrating Biomarker Discovery with Therapeutic Stratification.

Classic BCR::ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs)-polycythaemia vera, essential thrombocythaemia, and primary myelofibrosis-are clonal haematopoietic stem cell disorders with marked heterogeneity in clinical phenotype, disease trajectory, and therapeutic response. Genomic stratification by driver and cooperating mutations only partially accounts for this variability, leaving gaps in predicting thrombotic risk, fibrotic progression, leukaemic transformation, and treatment benefit. Proteomics bridges this gap by providing function-proximal readouts of protein abundance, post-translational modifications, pathway activity, and intercellular signalling that genomics and transcriptomics cannot capture, positioning it as a theranostic platform in which the same molecular readouts simultaneously inform diagnostic stratification and therapeutic decision-making. We propose a five-stage translational framework spanning from discovery-scale mass spectrometry and affinity-based plasma profiling to targeted validation, multicentre standardisation, and machine learning-integrated clinical panels. Proteomic evidence is synthesised across the following four disease axes: clonal fitness in haematopoietic stem and progenitor cells; bone marrow microenvironmental remodelling and fibrosis; chronic inflammation and thrombosis; and leukaemic transformation. We further describe how phosphoproteomics reveals resistance mechanisms to JAK inhibitors, including AXL-MAPK bypass and PP2A-autophagy-mediated tolerance, and how protein-level biomarkers (BCL2-BCL-XL, RAS-ERK, CAMK2G, and ROCK1/2) can guide individualised therapeutic selection. Affinity-based platforms (Olink PEA and SomaScan) and spatially resolved technologies (CODEX and single-cell proteomics) complement discovery proteomics. At present, however, this evidence base is constrained by small and heterogeneous cohorts, limited cross-platform reproducibility, and a scarcity of independent external validation for candidate protein panels. Realising this vision will require multicentre standardisation, analytically validated panel assays, and prospective clinical studies that translate molecular findings into decision-grade tools for patients with MPNs.