Exploratory analysis of the associations of the brain age gap with cognitive function and amyloid-β accumulation: participants selection based on metabolic and physiological blood markers.
Journal:
Neurobiology of aging
Published Date:
Mar 11, 2026
Abstract
The brain age gap (BAG) is defined as the difference between brain age estimated from MRI using artificial intelligence and chronological age, and has been proposed as a biomarker reflecting aging and neurodegeneration. However, the association between BAG and dementia-related biomarkers has yielded inconsistent findings in previous studies. Conventional training datasets have primarily been defined based on medical history and MRI findings, which may have included participants with underlying metabolic and physiological abnormalities, potentially contributing to these inconsistent results. In this exploratory study, we examined whether incorporating metabolic and physiological blood test parameters into participant selection would influence the association between BAG and dementia-related biomarkers. Using MRI and blood test data from 680 participants, we developed two machine learning-based brain age models. Model 1 was based on conventional selection criteria, whereas Model 2 additionally incorporated blood test parameters. BAG was estimated in 38 participants who underwent MRI and amyloid PET imaging. Differences between amyloid-positive and amyloid-negative groups were assessed using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test, and associations with standardized uptake value ratio, Centiloid scale, and Mini-Mental State Examination were evaluated using Spearman's rank correlation analysis. Model 2 showed higher BAG in the amyloid positive group and exhibited stronger associations with amyloid-β accumulation and cognitive function. These findings suggest that incorporating metabolic and physiological blood test parameters into participant selection may have emphasized the association between BAG and dementia-related biomarkers. However, because the independent test dataset was small, these results should be interpreted as exploratory, and validation in datasets is required.
Authors
Keywords
No keywords available for this article.