Sequential multi-site fine-tuning for incremental deployment of large language models for mobility functional status extraction.

Journal: JAMIA open
Published Date:

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated sequential multi-site fine-tuning of large language models (LLMs), simulating incremental deployment across institutions for extracting mobility functional status from unstructured clinical notes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We assembled a corpus of 600 clinical notes from 3 institutions, yielding 3810 annotated note sections (1200 training; 2610 testing). Building upon our previously established LLM mobility extraction pipeline, which utilized optimized prompt engineering, we applied parameter-efficient low-rank adaptation (LoRA) fine-tuning. We evaluated sequential multi-site fine-tuning, where the model is trained locally and only the updated LoRA weights are transferred to the next site. We compared this against joint fine-tuning, which requires pooling all multi-site patient data centrally before training. Performance was measured by micro F1-scores for 2 distinct subtasks: mobility extraction and impairment classification. RESULTS: Sequential multi-site fine-tuning yielded comparable results to centralized joint fine-tuning for mobility extraction (F1, 0.861 vs 0.894) and impairment classification (F1, 0.912 vs 0.900). Both sequential and joint fine-tuning outperformed an untuned 70B model. Additionally, single-site LoRA models showed robust cross-site generalization. DISCUSSION: Sequential multi-site fine-tuning offers a resource-friendly approach to adapt LLMs to clinical environments. By retaining previously acquired knowledge without severe interference, this strategy allows for local fine-tuning at each institution without the need to pool or share sensitive patient data required for joint fine-tuning. CONCLUSION: Sequential multi-site fine-tuning provides a viable solution for the scalable, incremental deployment of LLMs across institutions, showing promising generalizability for clinical information extraction from electronic health record narratives.

Authors

Keywords

No keywords available for this article.