Assessing digital health curriculum needs: a mixed-methods study of student and faculty perspectives in a Singapore medical school.

BACKGROUND: The rapid advancement of digital technologies has transformed healthcare delivery, creating an imperative for medical education to integrate digital health (DH) competencies into undergraduate training. Despite growing recognition of its importance, progress in embedding DH literacy within formal medical curricula has been uneven and slow. OBJECTIVE: This study examined DH education within an undergraduate medical programme by integrating faculty and student perspectives to identify curriculum development needs and inform evidence-based educational strategies. DESIGN: A mixed-methods study was conducted at a Singapore medical school offering a 5-year undergraduate curriculum. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with four faculty members as DH content experts, exploring curriculum design, pedagogical strategies, and competency expectations. A 24-item survey assessing knowledge, attitudes, and usage of DH tools was administered to students across pre-clinical and clinical training, with 131 responses from 848 eligible participants. Qualitative data were analysed using grounded theory-based thematic analysis, whilst survey data were analysed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Faculty interviews identified three key themes: curriculum gaps requiring more practical and clinically-oriented DH teaching, structural barriers including time constraints and rapid technological change, and complex stakeholder ecosystem influencing curriculum development. Student survey results revealed a persistent theory-practice gap across DH domains. Students reported high self-perceived knowledge in DH applications and artificial intelligence (AI) but consistently lower confidence in practical application, particularly in electronic health records (EHR) and telemedicine. Clinical students paradoxically rated their EHR knowledge lowest despite greater clinical exposure. Students expressed strong interest in programming, data analytics, and hands-on AI, favouring applied DH skills with direct clinical relevance. CONCLUSIONS: Medical curricula struggle to translate DH conceptual knowledge into practice, reconcile divergent competency expectations between students and faculty, and remain current amid rapid technological change. Tiered competency models, coupled with experiential learning approaches and continuous faculty development, represent a promising strategy for preparing future physicians for digitally enhanced healthcare delivery. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.