Clinical pathogen adjudication in metagenomic sequencing using a large language model
Journal:
medRxiv
Published Date:
Oct 21, 2026
Abstract
Clinical metagenomic sequencing detects hundreds of organisms whose relevance to infection requires clinicians' manual interpretation. We retrospectively reviewed 4,855 specimens from 19 sampling sites, linked 1.33 million detected organisms to clinical culprit-pathogen determinations, and fine-tuned a large language model on these labels. The model recovered 92.44% of reference culprit calls in the held-out test set and 84.49% in a later cohort. In a blinded re-adjudication of 215 cases, the model matched 90.5% of culprit calls on which both expert reviewers agreed. Adjudication accuracy varied with organism identity and specimen types. mNGS-derived metrics such as read counts or genome coverage alone were insufficient to identify culprit pathogens, and organisms classified as common colonizers could still be judged causative. Certain organisms were frequently co-reported as causative in the same specimen. These findings support further evaluation of human and AI-assisted report review, particularly regarding missed pathogens, excess calls, and differences across specimen types.
