Assessing ChatGPT's Proficiency in Simplifying Radiological Reports for Healthcare Professionals and Patients.

Journal: Cureus
Published Date:

Abstract

Background Clear communication of radiological findings is crucial for effective healthcare decision-making. However, radiological reports are often complex with technical terminology, making them challenging for non-radiology healthcare professionals and patients to comprehend. Large language models like ChatGPT (Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer, by OpenAI, San Francisco, CA) offer a potential solution by translating intricate reports into simplified language. This study aimed to assess the capability of ChatGPT-3.5 in simplifying radiological reports to facilitate improved understanding by healthcare professionals and patients. Materials and methods Nine radiological reports were taken for this study spanning various imaging modalities and medical conditions. These reports were used to ask ChatGPT a set of seven questions (describe the procedure, mention the key findings, express in a simple language, suggestions for further investigation, need of further investigation, grammatical or typing errors, and translation into Hindi). A total of eight radiologists rated the generated content in detailing, summarizing, simplifying content and language, factual correctness, further investigation, grammatical errors, and translation to Hindi. Results The highest score was obtained for detailing the report (94.17% accuracy) and the lowest score was for drawing conclusions for the patient (85% accuracy); case-wise scores were similar (p-value = 0.97). The Hindi translation by ChatGPT was not suitable for patient communication. Conclusion The current free version of ChatGPT-3.5 was able to simplify radiological reports effectively, removing technical jargon while preserving essential diagnostic information. The free version adeptly simplifies radiological reports, enhancing accessibility for healthcare professionals and patients. Hence, it has the potential to enhance medical communication, facilitating informed decision-making by healthcare professionals and patients.

Authors

  • Pradosh Kumar Sarangi
    Department of Radiodiagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Deoghar, Jharkhand, India.
  • Amrita Lumbani
    Physiology, Mayo Institute of Medical Sciences, Barabanki, IND.
  • M Sarthak Swarup
    Radiodiagnosis, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, IND.
  • Suvankar Panda
    Radiodiagnosis, SCB (Srirama Chandra Bhanja) Medical College and Hospital, Cuttack, IND.
  • Smruti Snigdha Sahoo
    Radiodiagnosis, SCB (Srirama Chandra Bhanja) Medical College and Hospital, Cuttack, IND.
  • Pratisruti Hui
    Radiodiagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Kalyani, Kalyani, IND.
  • Anish Choudhary
    Radiodiagnosis, Central Institute of Psychiatry, Ranchi, IND.
  • Sudipta Mohakud
    Department of Radiodiagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
  • Ranjan Kumar Patel
    Radiodiagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Bhubaneswar, IND.
  • Himel Mondal
    Department of Physiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Deoghar, Jharkhand, India.

Keywords

No keywords available for this article.