Evaluations of the Perturbation Resistance of the Deep-Learning-Based Ligand Conformation Optimization Algorithm.

Journal: Journal of chemical information and modeling
Published Date:

Abstract

In recent years, the deep learning (DL) technique has rapidly developed and shown great success in scoring the protein-ligand binding affinities. The protein-ligand conformation optimization based on DL-derived scoring functions holds broad application prospects, for instance, drug design and enzyme engineering. In this study, we evaluated the robustness of a DL-based ligand conformation optimization protocol (DeepRMSD+Vina) for optimizing structures with input perturbations by examining the predicted ligand binding poses and scoring. Our results clearly indicated that compared to traditional optimization algorithms (such as Prime MM-GBSA and Vina optimization), DeepRMSD+Vina exhibits higher performance when treating diverse protein-ligand cases. The DeepRMSD+Vina is robust and can always generate the correct binding structures even if perturbations (up to 3 Å) are introduced to the input structure. The success rate is 62% for perturbation with a RMSD within 2-3 Å. However, the success rate dramatically drops to 11% for large perturbations, with RMSD extending to 3-4 Å. Furthermore, compared to the widely used optimization protocol of AutoDock Vina, the DL-generated conformation shows a balanced performance for all of the systems under examination. Overall, the DL-based DeepRMSD+Vina is unarguably more reliable than the traditional methods, which is attributed to the physically inspired design of the neural networks in DeepRMSD+Vina where the distance-transformed features describing the atomic interactions between the protein and the ligand have been explicitly considered and modeled. The outstanding robustness of the DL-based ligand conformational optimization algorithm further validates its superiority in the field of conformational optimization.

Authors

  • Minghui Xin
    School of Physics, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
  • Zechen Wang
    School of Physics, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250100, China.
  • Zhihao Wang
    School of Information Science and Engineering, Shandong Normal University, Jinan, Shandong, China; Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory for Distributed Computer Software Novel Technology, Jinan, Shandong, China.
  • Yuanyuan Qu
    Department of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
  • Yanmei Yang
    College of Chemistry, Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, Collaborative Innovation Centre of Functionalized Probes for Chemical Imaging in Universities of Shandong, Key Laboratory of Molecular and Nano Probes, Ministry of Education, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250014, China.
  • Yong-Qiang Li
    School of Physics, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, China.
  • Mingwen Zhao
    School of Physics, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, China.
  • Liangzhen Zheng
    Tencent AI Lab, Shenzhen, China.
  • Yuguang Mu
    School of Biological Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 637551, Singapore.
  • Weifeng Li
    Department of Emergency Medicine, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, 510080, China.