Prioritization strategies for non-target screening in environmental samples by chromatography - High-resolution mass spectrometry: A tutorial.

Journal: Journal of chromatography. A
Published Date:

Abstract

Non-target screening (NTS) using chromatography coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS), has become fundamental for detecting and prioritizing chemicals of emerging concern (CECs) in complex environmental matrices. The vast number of generated features (m/z, retention time, and intensity) necessitate effective prioritization strategies to identify environmentally and toxicologically relevant CECs. Since compound identification remains a major bottleneck in NTS, prioritization is critical to focus identification efforts where they matter most. This tutorial presents seven prioritization strategies: (1) Target and suspect screening for identifying known or suspected compounds using reference libraries. (2) Data quality filtering to apply quality control measures to reduce noise and the number of false positives. (3) Chemistry-driven prioritization using HRMS data properties to prioritize specific compound classes (e.g., halogenated substances, transformation products). (4) Process-driven - using spatial, temporal, or process-based comparisons (pre- and post-technical processes) to identify key features. (5) Effect-Directed Analysis (EDA) and Virtual Effect-Directed Analysis (vEDA) prioritization to link chemical features to biological effects. (6) Prediction-based prioritization such as quantitative structure-property relationships (QSPR) and machine learning to estimate risk or concentration levels, and (7) Pixel- or tile-based analysis where the chromatographic image (2D data) is used to pin-point regions of interest or for comparison of larger sample sets. By integrating these prioritization strategies, this tutorial provides a structured foundation to evaluate both identified and unidentified features, prioritize high-risk compounds, and advance environmental risk assessment and regulatory decision-making.

Authors

  • Jonathan Zweigle
    Analytical Chemistry Group, Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
  • Selina Tisler
    Analytical Chemistry Group, Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
  • Marta Bevilacqua
    Analytical Chemistry Group, Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
  • Giorgio Tomasi
    Analytical Chemistry Group, Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
  • Nikoline J Nielsen
    Analytical Chemistry Group, Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
  • Nadine Gawlitta
    Analytical Chemistry Group, Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
  • Josephine S Lübeck
    Analytical Chemistry Group, Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
  • Age K Smilde
    Analytical Chemistry Group, Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
  • Jan H Christensen
    Analytical Chemistry Group, Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark. Electronic address: jch@plen.ku.dk.