Event-Driven Taxonomy (EDT) Screening: Leveraging Effect-Based Spectral Libraries to Accelerate Semiquantitative Nontarget Analysis of AhR Agonists in Sediment in the Era of Big Data.

Journal: Environmental science & technology
Published Date:

Abstract

Sediments contain complex chemical mixtures. While effect-directed analysis (EDA) combined with nontarget screening (NTS) is promising, its large-scale application has been limited by time-consuming workflows. Here, we developed an event-driven taxonomy (EDT)-Screening strategy to effectively identify and semiquantify nontarget bioactive contaminants in sediment, taking aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) activity as an example. To accelerate EDA and NTS workflows, this strategy integrated fractionation, bioassay, identification, and quantification into a single step by embedding two novel effect-based spectral libraries into LC-HRMS screening templates. The event driver (ED) library was assembled from data-mined AhR-active compounds, and the event driver ion (EDION) library contained effect-related fragment ions predicted by deep learning. Compared to conventional databases (e.g., ChemSpider), the AhR-ED library improved identification accuracy with a more complete AhR-agonist list and fewer false positives, while the AhR-EDION library uncovered additional AhR agonists, particularly industrial intermediates and transformation products often missed due to limited prior knowledge. With the multimodal learning-based semiquantitative module, the EDT-Screening strategy increased the explained bioactivity contribution from 7.1% to 82%, significantly expanding the detections of "unknown unknowns". Our findings show that effect-based HRMS libraries provided a rapid solution for identifying and prioritizing bioactive contaminants in complex chemical mixtures, advancing EDA-NTS workflows for environmental risk assessment.

Authors

  • Fei Cheng
    Guangdong Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution and Health, School of Environment, Jinan University, Guangzhou 511443, China.
  • Huizhen Li
    Guangdong Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution and Health, School of Environment, Jinan University, Guangzhou 511443, China.
  • Xiaohan Lou
    Guangdong Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution and Health, School of Environment, Jinan University, Guangzhou 511443, China.
  • Liwei He
    Guangdong Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution and Health, School of Environment, Jinan University, Guangzhou 511443, China.
  • Xinyan Wu
    State Key Laboratory of Separation Membranes and Membrane Processes, Tiangong University, Tianjin 300387, People's Republic of China; School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tiangong University, Tianjin 300387, People's Republic of China.
  • Jiehui Huang
    Guangdong Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution and Health, School of Environment, Jinan University, Guangzhou 511443, China.
  • Jiangmeng Kuang
    Thermo Fisher Scientific, Shanghai 200120, China.
  • Jinshui Che
    Thermo Fisher Scientific, Shanghai 200120, China.
  • Zhiqiang Yu
    Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Intelligent Robots and Systems, School of Mechatronical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China.
  • Jing You
    Guangdong Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution and Health, School of Environment, Jinan University, Guangzhou 511443, China.