The role of phytoplankton in structuring global oceanic dissolved organic carbon pools.

Journal: Nature communications
Published Date:

Abstract

Phytoplankton-derived dissolved organic carbon (DOC) is a major pathway for atmospheric CO transfer to long-lived oceanic DOC reservoirs. Yet, current models rarely accounted for its molecular and taxonomic heterogeneity across growth seasons. Here, using ultra-high-resolution mass spectrometry (FT-ICR MS), we characterized DOC molecular signatures across diverse algal taxa. Recalcitrant DOC accounted for over 10% of their total organic carbon in all algal groups, highlighting a widespread and previously underappreciated trait. Additionally, we integrated these signatures with satellite-derived, taxon-resolved chlorophyll-a concentrations to develop machine learning models for predicting overall surficial DOC concentrations. Including taxon-specific carbon allocation markedly improved model performance (R = 0.92 and 0.80 for the growth and decline phases, respectively), substantially outperforming models without such data (R = 0.69 and 0.46). Furthermore, leveraging these optimized models, we generated a global marine DOC dataset and found that diatoms explained up to 63.8% of the variance in surface DOC. We further showed that algal recalcitrant DOC production was significantly higher during growth than decline seasons globally. These findings offer insights into how bloom duration and climate-driven shifts in phytoplankton composition reshape oceanic DOC dynamics.

Authors

  • Zhe Lu
  • Guoming Qin
    Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Botany, Xiaoliang Research Station for Tropical Coastal Ecosystems, and Key Laboratory of Vegetation Restoration and Management of Degraded Ecosystems, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, P. R. China.
  • Lingling Zheng
    Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Yanyan Zhang
    College of Command Information System, PLA University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210007, China.
  • Lincheng Huang
    Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Botany, Xiaoliang Research Station for Tropical Coastal Ecosystems, and Key Laboratory of Vegetation Restoration and Management of Degraded Ecosystems, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, P. R. China.
  • Jinge Zhou
    Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Botany, Xiaoliang Research Station for Tropical Coastal Ecosystems, and Key Laboratory of Vegetation Restoration and Management of Degraded Ecosystems, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, P. R. China.
  • Yongxin Liu
  • Mianhai Zheng
    Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Botany, Xiaoliang Research Station for Tropical Coastal Ecosystems, and Key Laboratory of Vegetation Restoration and Management of Degraded Ecosystems, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, P. R. China.
  • Enqing Hou
    Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Botany, Xiaoliang Research Station for Tropical Coastal Ecosystems, and Key Laboratory of Vegetation Restoration and Management of Degraded Ecosystems, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, P. R. China.
  • Lirong Song
    School of Health Science and Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, P.R. China.
  • Hongbin Liu
    King's College, London, UK.
  • Nianzhi Jiao
    Fujian Key Laboratory of Marine Carbon Sequestration, Xiamen University, Xiamen, P. R. China.
  • Faming Wang
    Department of Biosystems, KU Leuven, 3001 Leuven, Belgium.