Reflection on modern methods: when worlds collide-prediction, machine learning and causal inference.

Journal: International journal of epidemiology
Published Date:

Abstract

Causal inference requires theory and prior knowledge to structure analyses, and is not usually thought of as an arena for the application of prediction modelling. However, contemporary causal inference methods, premised on counterfactual or potential outcomes approaches, often include processing steps before the final estimation step. The purposes of this paper are: (i) to overview the recent emergence of prediction underpinning steps in contemporary causal inference methods as a useful perspective on contemporary causal inference methods, and (ii) explore the role of machine learning (as one approach to 'best prediction') in causal inference. Causal inference methods covered include propensity scores, inverse probability of treatment weights (IPTWs), G computation and targeted maximum likelihood estimation (TMLE). Machine learning has been used more for propensity scores and TMLE, and there is potential for increased use in G computation and estimation of IPTWs.

Authors

  • Tony Blakely
    Health Inequalities Research Programme, Department of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.
  • John Lynch
    School of Public Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Koen Simons
    Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
  • Rebecca Bentley
    Centre for Health Equity, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
  • Sherri Rose
    Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.