The value of human data annotation for machine learning based anomaly detection in environmental systems.

Journal: Water research
PMID:

Abstract

Anomaly detection is the process of identifying unexpected data samples in datasets. Automated anomaly detection is either performed using supervised machine learning models, which require a labelled dataset for their calibration, or unsupervised models, which do not require labels. While academic research has produced a vast array of tools and machine learning models for automated anomaly detection, the research community focused on environmental systems still lacks a comparative analysis that is simultaneously comprehensive, objective, and systematic. This knowledge gap is addressed for the first time in this study, where 15 different supervised and unsupervised anomaly detection models are evaluated on 5 different environmental datasets from engineered and natural aquatic systems. To this end, anomaly detection performance, labelling efforts, as well as the impact of model and algorithm tuning are taken into account. As a result, our analysis reveals the relative strengths and weaknesses of the different approaches in an objective manner without bias for any particular paradigm in machine learning. Most importantly, our results show that expert-based data annotation is extremely valuable for anomaly detection based on machine learning.

Authors

  • Stefania Russo
    Eawag, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, 8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland; ETH Zürich, Ecovision Lab, Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Zürich, Switzerland. Electronic address: stefania.russo@geod.baug.ethz.ch.
  • Michael D Besmer
    onCyt Microbiology AG, Zürich, Switzerland.
  • Frank Blumensaat
    Eawag, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, 8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland; ETH Zürich, Institute of Environmental Engineering, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland.
  • Damien Bouffard
    Eawag, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, 8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland.
  • Andy Disch
    Eawag, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, 8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland.
  • Frederik Hammes
    Eawag, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, 8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland.
  • Angelika Hess
    Eawag, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, 8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland; ETH Zürich, Institute of Environmental Engineering, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland.
  • Moritz Lürig
    Eawag, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, 8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland; Eawag, Department of Fish Ecology & Evolution, Centre for Ecology Evolution and Biogeochemistry, 79 Seestrasse, 6047, Luzern; Department of Biology, Lund University, 22362 Lund, Sweden.
  • Blake Matthews
    Eawag, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, 8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland; Eawag, Department of Fish Ecology & Evolution, Centre for Ecology Evolution and Biogeochemistry, 79 Seestrasse, 6047, Luzern.
  • Camille Minaudo
    École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Physics of Aquatic Systems Laboratory, Margaretha Kamprad Chair, Lausanne, Switzerland.
  • Eberhard Morgenroth
    Eawag, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, 8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland.
  • Viet Tran-Khac
    INRAE, Université Savoie Mont Blanc, CARRTEL, 74200 Thonon-les-Bains, France.
  • Kris Villez
    Eawag, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, 8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland; Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, USA.