Applying interpretable machine learning workflow to evaluate exposure-response relationships for large-molecule oncology drugs.

Journal: CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology
Published Date:

Abstract

The application of logistic regression (LR) and Cox Proportional Hazard (CoxPH) models are well-established for evaluating exposure-response (E-R) relationship in large molecule oncology drugs. However, applying machine learning (ML) models on evaluating E-R relationships has not been widely explored. We developed a workflow to train regularized LR/CoxPH and tree-based XGboost (XGB) models, and derive the odds ratios for best overall response and hazard ratios for overall survival, across exposure quantiles to evaluate the E-R relationship using clinical trial datasets. The E-R conclusions between LR/CoxPH and XGB models are overall consistent, and largely aligned with historical pharmacometric analyses findings. Overall, applying this interpretable ML workflow provides a promising alternative method to assess E-R relationships for impacting key dosing decisions in drug development.

Authors

  • Gengbo Liu
    Department of Computer Engineering and Sciences, Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, FL, USA.
  • James Lu
    Modeling and Simulation/Clinical Pharmacology, Genentech, South San Francisco, CA.
  • Hong Seo Lim
    Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
  • Jin Yan Jin
    Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Genentech, South San Francisco, California, USA.
  • Dan Lu
    Institute of Translational Medicine, Medical College, Yangzhou University Yangzhou P. R. China cxw19861121@163.com ludan1968@126.com.