Innovative approach for predicting daily reference evapotranspiration using improved shallow and deep learning models in a coastal region: A comparative study.

Journal: Journal of environmental management
Published Date:

Abstract

Accurate and reliable estimation of Reference Evapotranspiration (ETo) is crucial for water resources management, hydrological processes, and agricultural production. The FAO-56 Penman-Monteith (FAO-56PM) approach is recommended as the standard model for ETo estimation; nevertheless, the absence of comprehensive meteorological variables at many global locations frequently restricts its implementation. This study compares shallow learning (SL) and deep learning (DL) models for estimating daily ETo against the FAO-56PM approach based on various statistic metrics and graphic tool over a coastal Red Sea region, Sudan. A novel approach of the SL model, the Catboost Regressor (CBR) and three DL models: 1D-Convolutional Neural Networks (1D-CNN), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), and Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) were adopted and coupled with a semi-supervised pseudo-labeling (PL) technique. Six scenarios were developed regarding different input combinations of meteorological variables such as air temperature (Tmin, Tmax, and Tmean), wind speed (U2), relative humidity (RH), sunshine hours duration (SSH), net radiation (Rn), and saturation vapor pressure deficit (es-ea). The results showed that the PL technique reduced the systematic error of SL and DL models during training for all the scenarios. The input combination of Tmin, Tmax, Tmean, and RH reflected higher performance than other combinations for all employed models. The CBR-PL model demonstrated good generalization abilities to predict daily ETo and was the overall superior model in the testing phase according to prediction accuracy, stability analysis, and less computation cost compared to DL models. Thus, the relatively simple CBR-PL model is highly recommended as a promising tool for predicting daily ETo in coastal regions worldwide which have limited climate data.

Authors

  • Hussam Eldin Elzain
    Department of Environmental & Earth Sciences, Pukyong National University, Busan, 48513, Korea.
  • Osman A Abdalla
    Department of Earth Sciences, College of Science, Sultan Qaboos University, P.O. 36, AlKhoud 123, Oman. Electronic address: osman@squ.edu.om.
  • Mohammed Abdallah
    College of Hydrology and Water Resources, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210024, China; The Hydraulics Research Station, PO Box 318, Wad Medani, Sudan. Electronic address: mabdallahhhu@gmail.com.
  • Ali Al-Maktoumi
    Water Research Center, Sultan Qaboos University, P.O. 50, AlKhoud 123, Oman; Department of Soils, Water and Agricultural Engineering, Sultan Qaboos University, P.O. 34, AlKhoud 123, Oman. Electronic address: ali4530@squ.edu.om.
  • Mohamed Eltayeb
    Faculty of Computer and Information Systems, Islamic University of Madinah, 42351, Saudi Arabia. Electronic address: mohammad2012191@gmail.com.
  • Sani I Abba
    Interdisciplinary Research Centre for Membranes and Water Security, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran, 31261, Saudi Arabia. Electronic address: saniisaabba86@gmail.com.