Freezing of gait detection: The effect of sensor type, position, activities, datasets, and machine learning model.

Journal: Journal of Parkinson's disease
PMID:

Abstract

BackgroundFreezing of gait (FoG) is a complex, frequent, and disabling motor symptom of Parkinson's disease (PD). Wearable technology has the potential to improve FoG assessment by providing objective, quantitative, and continuous monitoring.ObjectiveThis study aims to develop a robust FoG detection algorithm that can be embedded in a simple and unobtrusive wearable sensor system and can lead to a reliable unsupervised home assessment.MethodsTwenty-two subjects with PD and FoG were enrolled, equipped with four inertial modules on the ankles, back, and wrist, and asked to perform different tasks. Feature-driven and data-driven machine learning approaches were implemented, optimized, and evaluated. Further testing was conducted on two external datasets including a total of 545 FoG episodes.ResultsSixteen subjects experienced FoG, providing a total number of 101 FoG events. Results demonstrated that a single sensor on the ankle, with an adequate algorithm of data analysis based on machine learning, can provide a non-invasive approach for accurate FoG detection. The model proved robust on the independent datasets, with 88-95% FoG episodes correctly detected. Interestingly, while FoG can be easily discriminated from walking, static positions, and postural transitions, turning represents a significant challenge. The high number of false alarms still represents the main limitation of the FoG recognition algorithms.ConclusionsThe collected dataset includes data from different sensors at different body positions. This, together with detailed labeling of tasks, activities, FoG episodes and their severity, can be a significant contribution to research on automatic FoG detection and characterization.

Authors

  • Luigi Borzì
    Department of Control and Computer Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Turin, Italy.
  • Florenc Demrozi
    Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.
  • Ruggero Angelo Bacchin
    Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
  • Cristian Turetta
    Department of Engineering for Innovation Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
  • Luis Sigcha
    Department of Physical Education and Sports Science, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
  • Domiziana Rinaldi
    Department of Neuroscience, Mental Health and Sensory Organs, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
  • Giuliana Fazzina
    Department of Neuroscience, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
  • Giulio Balestro
    Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
  • Alessandro Picelli
    Neuromotor and Cognitive Rehabilitation Research Center, Department of Neurological and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
  • Graziano Pravadelli
    Department of Engineering for Innovation Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
  • Gabriella Olmo
    Politecnico di Torino - Control and Computer Engineering Department, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi, 24, Turin, 10129, Italy. Electronic address: https://www.sysbio.polito.it/analytics-technologies-health/.
  • Stefano Tamburin
    Neurology Section, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
  • Leonardo Lopiano
    Department of Neuroscience, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
  • Carlo Alberto Artusi
    Department of Neuroscience, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.