Deciphering and Mitigating of Dynamic Greenhouse Gas Emission in Urban Drainage Systems with Knowledge-Infused Graph Neural Network.

Journal: Environmental science & technology
PMID:

Abstract

Deciphering and mitigating dynamic greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions under environmental fluctuation in urban drainage systems (UDGSs) is challenging due to the absence of a high-prediction model that accurately quantifies the contributions of biological production pathways. Here we infused biological production pathways into the graph neural network (GNN) model architecture, developing ecological knowledge-infused GNN (EcoGNN-GHG) models to evaluate methane (CH) and nitrous oxide (NO) production in sewers and wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). The EcoGNN-GHG model demonstrated high predictive accuracy, achieving an of 0.96 for CH in sewers and 0.82 for NO in WWTPs. Model interpretability analysis revealed fluctuations in contributions of the anaerobic hydrolysis acidification pathway to CH production and the nitrification-denitrification pathway to NO production under dynamic environmental conditions, guiding the formulation of a precise dissolved oxygen control strategy targeting critical water quality parameters (acetate for CH production and nitrite for NO production). Implementing this strategy to control DO thereby regulating biological production pathway contributions, CH production in sewers and NO production in WWTPs were reduced by 35.50% and 29.94%, respectively. Our findings offer a robust, accurate method for predicting GHG emissions, quantifying production pathway contributions, and developing effective control strategies in UDGSs.

Authors

  • Wan-Xin Yin
    College of the Environment, Liaoning University, Shenyang 110036, PR China; State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen 518055, PR China.
  • Ke-Hua Chen
    Division of Emerging Interdisciplinary Areas (EMIA), Academy of Interdisciplinary Studies, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong 999077, China.
  • Jia-Qiang Lv
    State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen 518055, PR China.
  • Jia-Ji Chen
    CAS Key Laboratory of Environmental Biotechnology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, PR China.
  • Shuai Liu
    Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
  • Yun-Peng Song
    State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, School of Eco-Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China.
  • Yi-Wei Zhao
    State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, School of Eco-Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China.
  • Fang Huang
  • Hong-Xu Bao
    College of the Environment, Liaoning University, Shenyang 110036, PR China.
  • Hong-Cheng Wang
    State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen 518055, PR China. Electronic address: wanghongcheng@hit.edu.cn.
  • Ai-Jie Wang
    State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen 518055, PR China.
  • Nan-Qi Ren
    State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150090, China.