Comprehensive framework for thyroid disorder diagnosis: Integrating advanced feature selection, genetic algorithms, and machine learning for enhanced accuracy and other performance matrices.

Journal: PloS one
Published Date:

Abstract

Thyroid hormones control crucial physiological activities, such as metabolism, oxidative stress, erythropoiesis, thermoregulation, and organ development. Hormonal imbalances may cause serious conditions like cognitive impairment, depression, and nervous system damage. Traditional diagnostic techniques, based on hormone level measurements (TSH, T3, FT4, T4, and FTI), are usually lengthy and laborious. This study uses machine learning (ML) algorithms and feature selection based on GA to improve the accuracy and efficiency of diagnosing thyroid disorders using the UCI thyroid dataset. Five ML algorithms-LR, RF, SVM, AB, and DT- were tested using two paradigms: (1) default classifiers and (2) hybrid GA-ML models- GA-RF, GA-LR, GA-SVM, GA-DT, and GA-AB. The data pre-processed included handling missing values, feature scaling, and correlation analysis. In this case, the performance metrics used for model evaluation are accuracy, F1 Score, sensitivity, specificity, precision, and Cohen's Kappa with 80% of the dataset to train the model and the rest 20% used to test it. Among the non-hybrid models, RF achieved the highest accuracy, which was 93.93%. The hybrid GA-RF model outperformed all others, achieving a remarkable accuracy of 97.21%, along with superior metrics across all the evaluated parameters. These findings highlight the diagnostic potential of the GA-RF model in providing faster, more accurate, and reliable thyroid disorder detection. The research illustrated the potential of the hybrid GA-ML approaches to improving the clinical diagnostic process while proposing a strong and scalable approach towards thyroid disorder identification.

Authors

  • Ankur Kumar
    Drug Discovery and Development Laboratory (DDD Lab), Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, India.
  • Sanjay Dhanka
    Department of Electrical and Instrumentation Engineering,Sant Longowal Institute of Engineering and Technology, Longowal, Sangrur, Punjab, India. Electronic address: sanjaykumar506070@gmail.com.
  • Abhinav Sharma
    Department of Biological Sciences and Bioengineering (BSBE), IIT, Kanpur, India.
  • Anchal Sharma
    SCEE, IIT Mandi, Mandi, Himachal Pradesh, India.
  • Surita Maini
    Department of Electrical and Instrumentation Engineering,Sant Longowal Institute of Engineering and Technology, Longowal, Sangrur, Punjab, India. Electronic address: suritamaini@gmail.com.
  • Mochammad Fahlevi
    Management Department, BINUS Online, Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta, Indonesia.
  • Fazla Rabby
    Department of Management, Stanford Institute of Management and Technology, Sydney, Australia.
  • Mohammed Aljuaid
    Department of Health Administration, College of Business Administration, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
  • Rohit Bansal
    Department of Management Studies, Vaish College of Engineering, Rohtak, India.