Teaching postsecondary students about the ethics of artificial intelligence: A scoping review protocol.

Journal: PloS one
Published Date:

Abstract

The field of AI carries inherent risks such as algorithmic biases, security vulnerabilities, and ethical concerns related to privacy and data protection. Despite these risks, AI holds significant promise for social good, with applications ranging from improved healthcare diagnostics to enhanced education strategies. Teaching AI ethics in postsecondary settings has emerged as one of the strategies to mitigate AI-related harms. The objectives of this review are to (1) synthesize existing research related to teaching postsecondary students about the principles and practice of ethics and AI, and (2) identify how educators are evaluating changes in student knowledge, skills, attitudes, and behaviors. This scoping review will follow the first five steps articulated by Arksey and O'Malley. A structured search strategy developed by an academic librarian incorporates three primary concept groups related to education, AI, and ethics. Database search strategies emphasize sensitivity rather than precision, given that a supervised machine learning tool will be used to assist in the identification of relevant abstracts. Searches will be conducted in the following academic databases: PubMed, Embase, Scopus, ERIC, LISTA, IEEE Xplore, APA PsycInfo, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. Results will include an up-to-date synthesis of the current state of AI ethics education in postsecondary curricula, evaluated teaching strategies, and potential outcomes associated with AI ethics education. Search results will be reported according to the PRISMA-ScR checklist. Data charting will focus on AI ethics pedagogy. This review will inform future research, policy development, and teaching practices, offering valuable insights for educators, policymakers, and researchers working towards responsible AI integration. Findings will contribute to enhanced understandings of the complexities of AI ethics education and have the potential to shape the ways trainees in multiple disciplines learn about the ethical dimensions of AI in practice.

Authors

  • Calvin Hillis
    The Creative School, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Maushumi Bhattacharjee
    Faculty of Law, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
  • Batool AlMousawi
    Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Tarik Eltanahy
    The Creative School, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Sara Ono
    The Creative School, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Marcus Hui
    Department of Biology, Queens University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
  • Ba' Pham
    Knowledge Translation Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, 209 Victoria St, Toronto, Ontario, M5B 1T8, Canada.
  • Michelle Swab
    Health Sciences Library, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.
  • Gordon V Cormack
    David R. Cheriton School of Computer Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
  • Maura R Grossman
    David R. Cheriton School of Computer Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
  • Ebrahim Bagheri
    Laboratory for Systems, Software and Semantics (LS3), Ryerson University, Ontario, Canada(1). Electronic address: bagheri@ryerson.ca.
  • Zack Marshall
    Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.