Robust artificial neural network for reliability and sensitivity analyses of complex non-linear systems.

Journal: Neural networks : the official journal of the International Neural Network Society
Published Date:

Abstract

Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) are commonly used in place of expensive models to reduce the computational burden required for uncertainty quantification, reliability and sensitivity analyses. ANN with selected architecture is trained with the back-propagation algorithm from few data representatives of the input/output relationship of the underlying model of interest. However, different performing ANNs might be obtained with the same training data as a result of the random initialization of the weight parameters in each of the network, leading to an uncertainty in selecting the best performing ANN. On the other hand, using cross-validation to select the best performing ANN based on the ANN with the highest R value can lead to biassing in the prediction. This is as a result of the fact that the use of R cannot determine if the prediction made by ANN is biased. Additionally, R does not indicate if a model is adequate, as it is possible to have a low R for a good model and a high R for a bad model. Hence, in this paper, we propose an approach to improve the robustness of a prediction made by ANN. The approach is based on a systematic combination of identical trained ANNs, by coupling the Bayesian framework and model averaging. Additionally, the uncertainties of the robust prediction derived from the approach are quantified in terms of confidence intervals. To demonstrate the applicability of the proposed approach, two synthetic numerical examples are presented. Finally, the proposed approach is used to perform a reliability and sensitivity analyses on a process simulation model of a UK nuclear effluent treatment plant developed by National Nuclear Laboratory (NNL) and treated in this study as a black-box employing a set of training data as a test case. This model has been extensively validated against plant and experimental data and used to support the UK effluent discharge strategy.

Authors

  • Uchenna Oparaji
    Institute for Risk and Uncertainty, University of Liverpool, Chadwick Building, Peach Street, Liverpool L69 7ZF, United Kingdom; Institute of Nuclear Engineering and Science, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan. Electronic address: u.oparaji@liverpool.ac.uk.
  • Rong-Jiun Sheu
    Institute of Nuclear Engineering and Science, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
  • Mark Bankhead
    National Nuclear Laboratory, Chadwick House, Warrington Rd, Birchwood Park, Warrington, Cheshire, WA3 6AE, United Kingdom.
  • Jonathan Austin
    National Nuclear Laboratory, Chadwick House, Warrington Rd, Birchwood Park, Warrington, Cheshire, WA3 6AE, United Kingdom.
  • Edoardo Patelli
    Institute for Risk and Uncertainty, University of Liverpool, Chadwick Building, Peach Street, Liverpool L69 7ZF, United Kingdom. Electronic address: epatelli@liverpool.ac.uk.