Enhancing scholarly discourse in the age of artificial intelligence: A guided approach to effective peer review process.

Journal: La Tunisie medicale
Published Date:

Abstract

The integrity of the peer-review process (PRP) is paramount in academic publishing and serves as a critical filter for scholarly output. This mini-review centers on the introduction of comprehensive guidelines, presented in tables format, aimed at streamlining the interactions between authors and reviewers during the PRP. These guidelines, derived from an in-depth exploration of the PRP, offer structured and practical advice to ensure constructive, transparent, and effective communication, especially related to the use of artificial intelligence. While this mini-review discusses the strengths and challenges of the current PRP, its primary focus is on providing tangible recommendations to enhance the quality and efficiency of the PRP. By providing explicit guidelines and emphasizing the cooperative essence of peer review, this mini-review aims to improve the PRP, ensuring that it remains a robust mechanism for upholding the highest standards of research and knowledge dissemination in an evolving academic setting.

Authors

  • Ismail Dergaa
    Primary Health Care Corporation (PHCC), Doha, Qatar.
  • Lilia Zakhama
    Cardiology Department, Security Forces Hospital-La Masa, Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunisia.
  • Chedly Dziri
    Professor Emeritus - General Surgery, University of Tunis El Manar, Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, Director of Honoris Medical Simulation Center, Tunis, Tunisia.
  • Helmi Ben Saad
    Service of Physiology and Functional Explorations, Farhat HACHED Hospital, University of Sousse, Sousse, Tunisia.