AIMC Topic: Peer Review, Research

Clear Filters Showing 1 to 10 of 39 articles

Neurosurgical journals' policies on artificial intelligence use in manuscript preparation and peer review.

Neurosurgical review
As artificial intelligence (AI), particularly large language models (LLMs), continues to progress, its impact on academic publishing, both in manuscript drafting and peer review, has attracted considerable attention. In neurosurgery, where journals s...

Who reviewed this? Toward responsible integration of large language models for peer review of scientific articles in dental medicine.

Swiss dental journal
The introduction and advancement of large language models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT, DeepSeek, and Google Gemini, present both opportunities and challenges for peer review in dental research. In this article, we propose a framework to inform the discou...

Leveraging artificial intelligence in the peer review of neurosurgical research articles.

Neurosurgical review
The traditional peer review process is time-consuming and can delay the dissemination of critical research. This study evaluates the effectiveness of artificial intelligence (AI) in predicting the acceptance or rejection of neurosurgical manuscripts,...

ASM incorporates Imagetwin to address image duplication and preserve scientific accuracy.

mBio
Image duplication in scientific articles-accidental or intentional-undermines trust in research, authors, institutions, and publishers. Duplications not only cast doubt on researchers' scientific rigor, but they also raise concerns about potential mi...

A practical guide for nephrologist peer reviewers: evaluating artificial intelligence and machine learning research in nephrology.

Renal failure
Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are transforming nephrology by enhancing diagnosis, risk prediction, and treatment optimization for conditions such as acute kidney injury (AKI) and chronic kidney disease (CKD). AI-driven models...

Perspectives of Artificial Intelligence Use for In-House Ethics Checks of Journal Submissions.

Journal of Korean medical science
Artificial intelligence (AI) has shown its ability to transform academic writing and publishing. It offers significant benefits, including enhancing efficiency, consistency, and integrity, However, these advancements are accompanied by ethical concer...

Artificial Intelligence in Peer Review: Enhancing Efficiency While Preserving Integrity.

Journal of Korean medical science
The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) has transformed various aspects of scientific research, including academic publishing and peer review. In recent years, AI tools such as large language models have demonstrated their capability to...

The role of large language models in the peer-review process: opportunities and challenges for medical journal reviewers and editors.

Journal of educational evaluation for health professions
The peer review process ensures the integrity of scientific research. This is particularly important in the medical field, where research findings directly impact patient care. However, the rapid growth of publications has strained reviewers, causing...

A randomized controlled trial on anonymizing reviewers to each other in peer review discussions.

PloS one
Many peer-review processes involve reviewers submitting their independent reviews, followed by a discussion between the reviewers of each paper. A common question among policymakers is whether the reviewers of a paper should be anonymous to each othe...

Reviewer Experience Detecting and Judging Human Versus Artificial Intelligence Content: The Journal Essay Contest.

Stroke
Artificial intelligence (AI) large language models (LLMs) now produce human-like general text and images. LLMs' ability to generate persuasive scientific essays that undergo evaluation under traditional peer review has not been systematically studied...