Artificial intelligence in breast imaging.

Journal: Clinical radiology
Published Date:

Abstract

This article reviews current limitations and future opportunities for the application of computer-aided detection (CAD) systems and artificial intelligence in breast imaging. Traditional CAD systems in mammography screening have followed a rules-based approach, incorporating domain knowledge into hand-crafted features before using classical machine learning techniques as a classifier. The first commercial CAD system, ImageChecker M1000, relies on computer vision techniques for pattern recognition. Unfortunately, CAD systems have been shown to adversely affect some radiologists' performance and increase recall rates. The Digital Mammography DREAM Challenge was a multidisciplinary collaboration that provided 640,000 mammography images for teams to help decrease false-positive rates in breast cancer screening. Winning solutions leveraged deep learning's (DL) automatic hierarchical feature learning capabilities and used convolutional neural networks. Start-ups Therapixel and Kheiron Medical Technologies are using DL for breast cancer screening. With increasing use of digital breast tomosynthesis, specific artificial intelligence (AI)-CAD systems are emerging to include iCAD's PowerLook Tomo Detection and ScreenPoint Medical's Transpara. Other AI-CAD systems are focusing on breast diagnostic techniques such as ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). There is a gap in the market for contrast-enhanced spectral mammography AI-CAD tools. Clinical implementation of AI-CAD tools requires testing in scenarios mimicking real life to prove its usefulness in the clinical environment. This requires a large and representative dataset for testing and assessment of the reader's interaction with the tools. A cost-effectiveness assessment should be undertaken, with a large feasibility study carried out to ensure there are no unintended consequences. AI-CAD systems should incorporate explainable AI in accordance with the European Union General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).

Authors

  • E P V Le
    University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK; EPSRC Centre for Mathematical and Statistical Analysis of Multimodal Clinical Imaging, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0WA, UK.
  • Y Wang
    1 School of Public Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
  • Y Huang
    Research Information Solutions and Innovations , Columbus, OH.
  • S Hickman
    Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.
  • F J Gilbert
    EPSRC Centre for Mathematical and Statistical Analysis of Multimodal Clinical Imaging, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0WA, UK; Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK. Electronic address: fjg28@cam.ac.uk.