Building more accurate decision trees with the additive tree.

Journal: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Published Date:

Abstract

The expansion of machine learning to high-stakes application domains such as medicine, finance, and criminal justice, where making informed decisions requires clear understanding of the model, has increased the interest in interpretable machine learning. The widely used Classification and Regression Trees (CART) have played a major role in health sciences, due to their simple and intuitive explanation of predictions. Ensemble methods like gradient boosting can improve the accuracy of decision trees, but at the expense of the interpretability of the generated model. Additive models, such as those produced by gradient boosting, and full interaction models, such as CART, have been investigated largely in isolation. We show that these models exist along a spectrum, revealing previously unseen connections between these approaches. This paper introduces a rigorous formalization for the additive tree, an empirically validated learning technique for creating a single decision tree, and shows that this method can produce models equivalent to CART or gradient boosted stumps at the extremes by varying a single parameter. Although the additive tree is designed primarily to provide both the model interpretability and predictive performance needed for high-stakes applications like medicine, it also can produce decision trees represented by hybrid models between CART and boosted stumps that can outperform either of these approaches.

Authors

  • José Marcio Luna
    Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63110, United States.
  • Efstathios D Gennatas
    Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94115.
  • Lyle H Ungar
    Department of Computer & Information Science, University of Pennsylvania.
  • Eric Eaton
    Department of Computing and Information Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
  • Eric S Diffenderfer
    Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States.
  • Shane T Jensen
    Department of Statistics, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Charles B Simone
    Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland Medical Center.
  • Jerome H Friedman
    Department of Statistics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305 gilmer.valdes@ucsf.edu jose.luna@pennmedicine.upenn.edu jhf@stanford.edu.
  • Timothy D Solberg
    U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.
  • Gilmer Valdes
    Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, California.