Feasibility of using the postauricular-groove approach without endoscopic assistant for excision of parotid tumors. Results from a series of 58 cases.

Journal: Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery
Published Date:

Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and preliminary outcomes of using a postauricular-groove approach without endoscopic assistance for the excision of parotid tumors. Patients who underwent parotidectomy using a postauricular-groove incision were selected for this study. For patients in which parotidectomy was difficult, namely, for tumors located in the deep lobe area, the parotid gland sternocleidomastoid space was fully utilized, and the tumor was resected from the posterior plane. A total of fifty-eight patients with parotid tumor were enrolled and divided into superior lobe group (n = 46) and deep lobe group (n = 12). The difference in operation time (94 vs 119 min) and postoperative drainage (20.18 vs 45.33 mL) was statistically significant between the tumors in the superficial and deep lobes. However, postoperative cosmetic VAS score was 10 (extremely satisfied) for all patients. The incidence of transient facial nerve paralysis was comparable (8.7% vs 16.7%), and all of them resolved spontaneously within 3 months. No recurrence of tumors was found in either group in the median follow-up interval of 26.45 months (range 22.2-35.3 months), which was comparable to the result using the conventional "S" approach. After making full use of the parotid gland sternocleidomastoid space, the postauricular-groove approach demonstrated satisfactory facial nerve protection, as well as easy maneuverability without the risk of surgical complications for tumors located in the deep lobe area. Importantly, the postauricular-groove approach showed excellent cosmetic outcomes for all patients and should be considered an alternative approach for parotidectomy of selected cases.

Authors

  • Xin Yang
    Department of Oral Maxillofacial-Head Neck Oncology, Ninth People's Hospital, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology & Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai, China.
  • Liang Wang
    Information Department, Dazhou Central Hospital, Dazhou 635000, China.
  • Yi Shen
    Department of Oral Maxillofacial-Head Neck Oncology, Ninth People's Hospital, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology & Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai, China. Electronic address: shenyi_777@126.com.
  • Bing Guo
    Department of Oral Maxillofacial-Head Neck Oncology, Ninth People's Hospital, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology & Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai, China.
  • Zhi-Wei Zheng
    Department of Oral Maxillofacial-Head Neck Oncology, Ninth People's Hospital, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology & Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai, China.
  • Jian Sun
    Department Of Computer Science, University of Denver, 2155 E Wesley Ave, Denver, Colorado, 80210, United States of America.