Ninety-day morbidity of robot-assisted redo surgery for recurrent rectal prolapse, mesh erosion and pelvic pain: lessons learned from 9 years' experience in a tertiary referral centre.

Journal: Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland

PMID: 34741395

Abstract

AIM: With increasing follow-up of patients treated with minimally invasive ventral mesh rectopexy (VMR) more redo surgery can be expected for recurrent rectal prolapse, mesh erosion and pelvic pain. The aim of this study is to evaluate the 90-day morbidity of robot-assisted redo interventions.

Authors

Emma M van der Schans

Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Center, Maatweg 3, 3813 TZ, Amersfoort, The Netherlands. em.vander.schans@meandermc.nl.
Paul M Verheijen

Jan J van Iersel, Tim JC Paulides, Paul M Verheijen, Ivo AMJ Broeders, Esther CJ Consten, Meander Medical Centre, Department of Surgery, 3813 TZ Amersfoort, The Netherlands.
Ivo A M J Broeders

Department of Robotics and Mechatronics, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.
Esther C J Consten

Jan J van Iersel, Tim JC Paulides, Paul M Verheijen, Ivo AMJ Broeders, Esther CJ Consten, Meander Medical Centre, Department of Surgery, 3813 TZ Amersfoort, The Netherlands.

Keywords

Humans Laparoscopy Morbidity Pelvic Pain Postoperative Complications Rectal Prolapse Rectum Recurrence Retrospective Studies Robotics Surgical Mesh Tertiary Care Centers Treatment Outcome

External Resources

View on PubMed Access via DOI PubMed (34741395)

Ninety-day morbidity of robot-assisted redo surgery for recurrent rectal prolapse, mesh erosion and pelvic pain: lessons learned from 9 years' experience in a tertiary referral centre.

Abstract

Authors

Keywords

External Resources

Popular Topics

Recent Journals