Improved Manual Annotation of EEG Signals through Convolutional Neural Network Guidance.

Journal: eNeuro
Published Date:

Abstract

The development of validated algorithms for automated handling of artifacts is essential for reliable and fast processing of EEG signals. Recently, there have been methodological advances in designing machine-learning algorithms to improve artifact detection of trained professionals who usually meticulously inspect and manually annotate EEG signals. However, validation of these methods is hindered by the lack of a gold standard as data are mostly private and data annotation is time consuming and error prone. In the effort to circumvent these issues, we propose an iterative learning model to speed up and reduce errors of manual annotation of EEG. We use a convolutional neural network (CNN) to train on expert-annotated eyes-open and eyes-closed resting-state EEG data from typically developing children ( = 30) and children with neurodevelopmental disorders ( = 141). To overcome the circular reasoning of aiming to develop a new algorithm and benchmarking to a manually-annotated gold standard, we instead aim to improve the gold standard by revising the portion of the data that was incorrectly learned by the network. When blindly presented with the selected signals for re-assessment (23% of the data), the two independent expert-annotators changed the annotation in 25% of the cases. Subsequently, the network was trained on the expert-revised gold standard, which resulted in improved separation between artifacts and nonartifacts as well as an increase in balanced accuracy from 74% to 80% and precision from 59% to 76%. These results show that CNNs are promising to enhance manual annotation of EEG artifacts and can be improved further with better gold-standard data.

Authors

  • Marina Diachenko
    Department of Integrative Neurophysiology, Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research (CNCR), Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1081 HV, The Netherlands.
  • Simon J Houtman
    Department of Integrative Neurophysiology, Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research (CNCR), Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1081 HV, The Netherlands.
  • Erika L Juarez-Martinez
    Department of Integrative Neurophysiology, Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research (CNCR), Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1081 HV, The Netherlands.
  • Jennifer R Ramautar
    Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychosocial Care, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam 1105 AZ, The Netherlands.
  • Robin Weiler
    Department of Integrative Neurophysiology, Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research (CNCR), Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1081 HV, The Netherlands.
  • Huibert D Mansvelder
    Department of Integrative Neurophysiology, CNCR, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Hilgo Bruining
    Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychosocial Care, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam 1105 AZ, The Netherlands.
  • Peter Bloem
    Informatics Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1081 HV, The Netherlands.
  • Klaus Linkenkaer-Hansen
    Department of Integrative Neurophysiology, CNCR, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. klaus.linkenkaer@cncr.vu.nl.