A comprehensive evaluation of sexual and reproductive outcomes following robot-assisted retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for nonseminomatous germ cell tumor.

Journal: Asian journal of andrology
Published Date:

Abstract

Sexual disorders following retroperitoneal pelvic lymph node dissection (RPLND) for testis tumor can affect the quality of life of patients. The aim of the current study was to investigate several different andrological outcomes, which may be influenced by robot-assisted (RA) RPLND. From January 2012 to March 2020, 32 patients underwent RA-RPLND for stage I nonseminomatous testis cancer or postchemotherapy (PC) residual mass. Modified unilateral RPLND nerve-sparing template was always used. Major variables of interest were erectile dysfunction (ED), premature ejaculation (PE), dry ejaculation (DE), or orgasm alteration. Finally, fertility as well as the fecundation process (sexual intercourse or medically assisted procreation [MAP]) was investigated. Ten patients (31.3%) presented an andrological disorder of any type after RA-RPLND. Hypospermia was present in 4 (12.5%) patients, DE (International Index of Erectile Function-5 [IIEF-5] <25) in 3 (9.4%) patients, and ED in 3 (9.4%) patients. No PE or orgasmic alterations were described. Similar median age at surgery, body mass index (BMI), number of nodes removed, scholar status, and preoperative risk factor rates were identified between groups. Of all these 10 patients, 6 (60.0%) were treated at the beginning of our robotic experience (2012-2016). Of all 32 patients, 5 (15.6%) attempted to have a child after RA-RPLND. All of these 5 patients have successfully fathered children, but 2 (40.0%) required a MAP. In conclusion, a nonnegligible number of andrological complications occurred after RA-RPLND, mainly represented by ejaculation disorders, but ED occurrence and overall sexual satisfaction deficit should be definitely considered. No negative impact on fertility was described after RA-RPLND.

Authors

  • Francesco A Mistretta
    Department of Urology, University of Milan, IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico Foundation, Milan, Italy - mistretta.francesco.a@gmail.com.
  • Ottavio De Cobelli
    Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), Via Giuseppe Ripamonti, 435, 20141, Milan, Italy.
  • Paolo Verze
    Department of Urology, Federico II University, Naples, Italy.
  • Francesco Botticelli
    Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan 20141, Italy.
  • Letizia Jannello
    Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan 20141, Italy.
  • Stefano Luzzago
    Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
  • Gabriele Cozzi
    Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO) IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
  • Roberto Bianchi
    Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), Via Giuseppe Ripamonti, 435, 20141, Milan, Italy.
  • Ettore Di Trapani
    Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO) IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
  • Matteo Ferro
    Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO) IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
  • Giovanni Cordima
    Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO) IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
  • Danilo Bottero
    Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO) IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
  • Deliu Victor Matei
    Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO) IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
  • Vincenzo Mirone
    Department of Urology, Federico II University, Naples, Italy.
  • Gennaro Musi
    Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.