Artificial Intelligence for Detecting Cephalometric Landmarks: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Journal: Journal of digital imaging
PMID:

Abstract

Using computer vision through artificial intelligence (AI) is one of the main technological advances in dentistry. However, the existing literature on the practical application of AI for detecting cephalometric landmarks of orthodontic interest in digital images is heterogeneous, and there is no consensus regarding accuracy and precision. Thus, this review evaluated the use of artificial intelligence for detecting cephalometric landmarks in digital imaging examinations and compared it to manual annotation of landmarks. An electronic search was performed in nine databases to find studies that analyzed the detection of cephalometric landmarks in digital imaging examinations with AI and manual landmarking. Two reviewers selected the studies, extracted the data, and assessed the risk of bias using QUADAS-2. Random-effects meta-analyses determined the agreement and precision of AI compared to manual detection at a 95% confidence interval. The electronic search located 7410 studies, of which 40 were included. Only three studies presented a low risk of bias for all domains evaluated. The meta-analysis showed AI agreement rates of 79% (95% CI: 76-82%, I = 99%) and 90% (95% CI: 87-92%, I = 99%) for the thresholds of 2 and 3 mm, respectively, with a mean divergence of 2.05 (95% CI: 1.41-2.69, I = 10%) compared to manual landmarking. The menton cephalometric landmark showed the lowest divergence between both methods (SMD, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.82; 1.53; I = 0%). Based on very low certainty of evidence, the application of AI was promising for automatically detecting cephalometric landmarks, but further studies should focus on testing its strength and validity in different samples.

Authors

  • Germana de Queiroz Tavares Borges Mesquita
    Postgraduate Program in Dentistry, School of Dentistry, São Leopoldo Mandic, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Walbert A Vieira
    Department of Restorative Dentistry, Endodontics Division, School of Dentistry of Piracicaba, State University of Campinas, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Maria Tereza Campos Vidigal
    School of Dentistry, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
  • Bruno Augusto Nassif Travençolo
    Faculty of Computing (FACOM), Federal University of Uberlândia (UFU), Uberlândia, MG, Brazil.
  • Thiago Leite Beaini
    Department of Preventive and Community Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Uberlândia, Campus Umuarama Av. Pará, 1720, Bloco 2G, sala 1, 38405-320, Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
  • Rubens Spin-Neto
    Oral Radiology, Department of Dentistry and Oral Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark. Electronic address: Rsn@dent.au.dk.
  • Luiz Renato Paranhos
    Department of Preventive and Community Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Uberlândia, Campus Umuarama Av. Pará, 1720, Bloco 2G, sala 1, 38405-320, Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, Brazil. paranhos.lrp@gmail.com.
  • Rui Barbosa de Brito Júnior
    Postgraduate Program in Dentistry, School of Dentistry, São Leopoldo Mandic, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.