Abdominal and robotic sacrocolpopexy costs following implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery.

Journal: International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics
Published Date:

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare perioperative costs and morbidity between open and robotic sacrocolpopexy after implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway.

Authors

  • Mary V Baker
    Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Vanderbilt University, 1121 Medical Center Drive, Nashville, TN, 37232, USA. Mary.vm.baker@vumc.org.
  • Ayssa Teles Abrao Trad
    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic School of Graduate Medical Education, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
  • Prajakta Tamhane
    Department of Family Medicine, Reid Health, Richmond, Indiana, USA.
  • Amy L Weaver
    Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
  • Sue L Visscher
    Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
  • Bijan J Borah
    Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science and the Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Rochester, MN, USA. Electronic address: borah.bijan@mayo.edu.
  • Christopher J Klingele
    Obstetrics & Gynecology, Olmsted Medical Center, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
  • John B Gebhart
    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
  • Emanuel C Trabuco
    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.