Development of a recurrent spatiotemporal deep-learning method coupled with data fusion for correction of hourly ozone forecasts.

Journal: Environmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987)
Published Date:

Abstract

Ambient ozone (O) predictions can be very challenging mainly due to the highly nonlinear photochemistry among its precursors, and meteorological conditions and regional transport can further complicate the O formation processes. The emission-based chemical transport models (CTM) are broadly used to predict O formation, but they may deviate from observations due to input uncertainties such as emissions and meteorological data, in addition to the treatment of O nonlinear chemistry. In this study, an innovative recurrent spatiotemporal deep-learning (RSDL) method with model-monitor coupled convolutional recurrent neural networks (ConvRNN) has been developed to improve O predictions of CTM. The RSDL method was first used to build the ConvRNN within a 24-h scale to characterize the spatiotemporal relationships between the monitored O data and CTM simulations, and then incorporated the recurrent pattern to achieve 72-h multi-site forecasts based on a pilot study over the Pearl River Delta (PRD) region of China. The results showed that the RSDL method predicted O with high accuracy over this case study, with an increase of 27.54% in the correlation coefficient (R) average for all sites as well as an increase in R of 0.14-0.21 for all cities compared to CTM. Moreover, the regional distribution of CTM was further improved by the RSDL predictions with the data fusion technique, which greatly reduced the underpredictions of O concentrations, particularly in high O-level areas (concentrations >160 μg/m), with a 33.55% reduction in the mean absolute error (MAE).

Authors

  • Jie Li
    Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area Artificial Intelligence Application Technology Research Institute, Shenzhen Polytechnic University, Shenzhen, China.
  • Ji-Cheng Jang
    Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Environment and Pollution Control, School of Environment and Energy, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou Higher Education Mega Center, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
  • Yun Zhu
    College of Environment and Energy, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou Higher Education Mega Center, Guangzhou 510006, China.
  • Che-Jen Lin
    Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Lamar University, Beaumont, TX, 77710, USA.
  • Shuxiao Wang
    State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
  • Jia Xing
    State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
  • Xinyi Dong
    Joint International Research Laboratory of Atmospheric and Earth System Sciences and Institute for Climate and Global Change Research, School of Atmospheric Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210023, China.
  • Jinying Li
    Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Environment and Pollution Control, School of Environment and Energy, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou Higher Education Mega Center, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
  • Bin Zhao
    University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
  • Bingyao Zhang
    Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Environment and Pollution Control, School of Environment and Energy, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou Higher Education Mega Center, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
  • Yingzhi Yuan
    Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Environment and Pollution Control, School of Environment and Energy, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou Higher Education Mega Center, Guangzhou, 510006, China.