Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate Robot-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Patients with Extremely Large Prostates ≥200 cc: A Comparative Analysis.

Journal: Journal of endourology
PMID:

Abstract

Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) and holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) are both well-established, minimally invasive surgical treatment options for lower urinary tract symptoms caused by benign prostatic enlargement. We have reported the first comparative analysis of both techniques in patients with prostates of ≥200 cc. Between 2009 and 2020 a total of 53 patients with a prostate volume of ≥200 cc were surgically treated at OLV Hospital Aalst (Belgium): 31 underwent RASP and 22 underwent HoLEP. Preoperative and postoperative assessments included uroflowmetry with maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) and postvoid residual volume (PVR), as well as the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and quality of life (IPSS-QoL). The complication rates were evaluated according to the Clavien-Dindo Classification. Patients treated with RASP had significantly larger prostate volumes compared with HoLEP (median 226 cc 204.5 cc,  = 0.004). After a median follow-up of 14 months, both groups showed a significant improvement in the maximum flow rate (+10.60 mL/s +10.70 mL/s,  = 0.724) and a reduction of the IPSS score (-12.50 -9,  = 0.246) as well as improvement of the QoL (-3 -3,  = 0.880). Median operative time was similar in both groups (150 minutes 132.5 minutes,  = 0.665). The amount of resected tissue was lower in the RASP group (134.5 g 180 g,  = 0.029) and there was no significant difference in postoperative prostate-specific antigen (1.2 ng/mL 0.8 ng/mL,  = 0.112). Despite a similar median catheterization time (3 days 2 days,  = 0.748), the median hospitalization time was shorter in the HoLEP group (4 days 3 days,  = 0.052). Complication rates were similar in both groups (32% 36%,  = 0.987). Our results suggest similar outcomes for RASP and HoLEP in patients with very large prostates ≥200 cc. These findings will require external validation at other high-volume centers.

Authors

  • Jolien Van Der Jeugt
    Department of Urology, Onze Lieve Vrouw Hospital, Aalst, Belgium.
  • Paolo Umari
    Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
  • Angelo Mottaran
    Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna.
  • Luís Ribeiro
    Department of Electronics, Telecommunications and Informatics and Institute of Electronics and Telematics Engineering of Aveiro, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal. luisribeiro@ua.pt.
  • Edward Lambert
    Department of Urology, Onze Lieve Vrouw Hospital, Aalst, Belgium. Electronic address: edward.lambert@ugent.be.
  • Jonathan Vollemaere
    Department of Urology, Onze Lieve Vrouw Hospital, Aalst, Belgium.
  • Dries Develtere
    Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium.
  • Ralf Veys
    Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis, Aalst, Belgium.
  • Marijn Goossens
    Department of Urology, Onze Lieve Vrouw Hospital, Aalst, Belgium.
  • Kim Pauwaert
    Department of Urology, Gent University Hospital, Gent, Belgium.
  • Simone Scarcella
    Department of Urology, Polytechnic University of Marche Region, Umberto I Hospital "Ospedali Riuniti", 71 Conca Street, 60126, Ancona, Italy. simoscarc@gmail.com.
  • Charles Van Praet
    Department of Urology Ghent University Hospital Ghent Belgium.
  • Elisabeth Pauwels
    ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium.
  • Ruben De Groote
    ORSI Academy Melle Belgium.
  • Frederiek D'Hondt
    General Surgery and Urology. OLV Hospital. Belgium.
  • Geert De Naeyer
    General Surgery and Urology. OLV Hospital. Belgium.
  • Alexandre Mottrie
    ORSI Academy Melle Belgium.
  • Peter Schatteman
    General Surgery and Urology. OLV Hospital. Belgium.