Comparing pentafecta outcomes between nerve sparing and non nerve sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a propensity score-matched study.

Journal: Scientific reports
PMID:

Abstract

Pentafecta (continence, potency, cancer control, free surgical margins, and no complications) is an important outcome of prostatectomy. Our objective was to assess the pentafecta achievement between nerve-spring and non-nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in a large single-center cohort. The study included 1674 patients treated with RARP between August 2009 and November 2022 to assess the clinical outcomes. Cox regression analyses were performed to evaluate the prognostic significance of RARP for pentafecta achievement, and 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was performed between the nerve-sparing and non-nerve-sparing to test the validity of the results. Pentafecta definition included continence, which was defined as the use of zero pads; potency, which was defined as the ability to achieve and maintain satisfactory erections or ones firm enough for sexual activity and sexual intercourse. The biochemical recurrence rate was defined as two consecutive PSA levels > 0.2 ng/mL after RARP; 90-day Clavien-Dindo complications ≤ 3a; and a negative surgical pathologic margin. The median follow-up period was 61.3 months (IQR 6-159 months). A multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that pentafecta achievement was significantly associated with nerve-sparing (NS) approach (1188 patients) (OR 4.16; 95% CI 2.51-6.9), p < 0.001), unilateral nerve preservation (983 patients) (OR 3.83; 95% CI 2.31-6.37, p < 0.001) and bilateral nerve preservation (205 patients) (OR 7.43; 95% CI 4.14-13.36, p < 0.001). After propensity matching, pentafecta achievement rates in the NS (476 patients) and non-NS (476 patients) groups were 72 (15.1%) and 19 (4%), respectively. (p < 0.001). NS in RARP offers a superior advantage in pentafecta achievement compared with non-NS RARP. This validation study provides the pentafecta outcome after RARP associated with nerve-sparing in clinical practice.

Authors

  • Tanan Bejrananda
    Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, 90110, Songkhla, Thailand. btanan@medicine.psu.ac.th.
  • Kiyoshi Takahara
    Department of Urology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan.
  • Dutsadee Sowanthip
    Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, The Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand.
  • Tomonari Motonaga
    Department of Urology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukakecho, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan.
  • Kota Yagi
    Department of Urology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukakecho, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan.
  • Wataru Nakamura
    Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan.
  • Masanobu Saruta
    Department of Urology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukakecho, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan.
  • Takuhisa Nukaya
    Department of Urology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan.
  • Masashi Takenaka
    Department of Urology and School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan.
  • Kenji Zennami
    Department of Urology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan.
  • Manabu Ichino
    Department of Urology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan.
  • Hitomi Sasaki
    Department of Urology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan.
  • Makoto Sumitomo
    Department of Urology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan.
  • Ryoichi Shiroki
    Department of Urology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan.