Use of tree-based machine learning methods to screen affinitive peptides based on docking data.

Journal: Molecular informatics
Published Date:

Abstract

Screening peptides with good affinity is an important step in peptide-drug discovery. Recent advancement in computer and data science have made machine learning a useful tool in accurately affinitive-peptide screening. In current study, four different tree-based algorithms, including Classification and regression trees (CART), C5.0 decision tree (C50), Bagged CART (BAG) and Random Forest (RF), were employed to explore the relationship between experimental peptide affinities and virtual docking data, and the performance of each model was also compared in parallel. All four algorithms showed better performances on dataset pre-scaled, -centered and -PCA than other pre-processed dataset. After model re-built and hyperparameter optimization, the optimal C50 model (C50O) showed the best performances in terms of Accuracy, Kappa, Sensitivity, Specificity, F1, MCC and AUC when validated on test data and an unknown PEDV datasets evaluation (Accuracy=80.4 %). BAG and RFO (the optimal RF), as two best models during training process, did not performed as expecting during in testing and unknown dataset validations. Furthermore, the high correlation of the predictions of RFO and BAG to C50O implied the high stability and robustness of their prediction. Whereas although the good performance on unknown dataset, the poor performance in test data validation and correlation analysis indicated CARTO could not be used for future data prediction. To accurately evaluate the peptide affinity, the current study firstly gave a tree-model competition on affinitive peptide prediction by using virtual docking data, which would expand the application of machine learning algorithms in studying PepPIs and benefit the development of peptide therapeutics.

Authors

  • Hua Feng
    Clinical Epidemiology and Comparative Effectiveness Program, Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. Debakey VA Medical Center, John P. McGovern Campus, 2450 Holcombe Blvd., Suite 01Y, Houston, TX, 77021, USA.
  • Fangyu Wang
    Henan Key Laboratory of Animal Immunology, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou, China.
  • Ning Li
    Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Center for Respiratory Medicine, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of School of Medicine, and International School of Medicine, International Institutes of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Yiwu, China.
  • Qian Xu
    College of Information Science and Engineering, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, P.R. China.
  • Guanming Zheng
    Department of Statistics, University of Michigan, Ann arbor 48105, USA.
  • Xuefeng Sun
    Department of Nephrology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Chinese PLA Institute of Nephrology, State Key Laboratory of Kidney Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Kidney Diseases, Beijing Key Laboratory of Kidney Disease Research, Beijing, China.
  • Man Hu
    Department of Ophthalmology, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
  • Xuewu Li
    Henan Key Laboratory of Animal Immunology, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou, China.
  • Guangxu Xing
    Henan Key Laboratory of Animal Immunology, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou, China.
  • Gaiping Zhang
    Henan Key Laboratory of Animal Immunology, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou, China.