Comparative Analysis of Milking and Behavior Characteristics of Multiparous and Primiparous Cows in Robotic Systems.

Journal: Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias
PMID:

Abstract

Robotic milking systems are successful innovations in the development of dairy cattle. The objective of this study was to analyse the milking characteristics and behavior of dairy cows of different calving orders in "milk first" robotic milking systems. The data were collected from a commercial herd located in the Midwest region of Minas Gerais (Brazil), which uses an automatic milking system (AMS TM, DeLaval). Were analysed 26,574 observations of 235 Holstein cows were available. Data were evaluated by multivariate analysis of variance and the Tukey test. - Tthe characteristics milk flow and milking efficiency were more favourable for multiparous cows (p <0.01), while the time in the stall was more favourable for primiparous females (p <0.01). The values of handling time were better in the primiparous cows (p <0.01). Primiparous cows had higher amounts of kick-off (p <0.001), and multiparous cows had higher incomplete milkings (p <0.001). The number of incomplete milkings showed a higher ratio in terms of reduction in milk production in 26.6% in primiparous cows and 26.7% in multiparous cows (p <0.01). Regarding the behavioral characteristics, primiparous cows had higher amounts of kickbacks, while multiparous cows had greater quantities of incomplete milkings.

Authors

  • Flor Angela N Rodriguez
    Universidade Federal de Lavras, Departamento de Medicina Veterinária/DMV, Campus UFLA, Trevo Rotatório Professor Edmir Sá, s/n, 37200-000 Lavras, MG, Brazil.
  • Marcos Aurélio Lopes
    Universidade Federal de Lavras, Departamento de Medicina Veterinária/DMV, Campus UFLA, Trevo Rotatório Professor Edmir Sá, s/n, 37200-000 Lavras, MG, Brazil.
  • André Luis R Lima
    Universidade Federal de Lavras, Departamento de Administração e Economia/DAE Campus UFLA Trevo Rotatório Professor Edmir Sá, s/n, 37200-000 Lavras, MG, Brazil.
  • Gercílio A DE Almeida Júnior
    Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Centro Agropecuário, Alto Universitário, s/n, Guararema, 29500-000 Alegre, ES, Brazil.
  • André Luiz M Novo
    Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária, Centro de Pesquisa de Pecuária do Sudeste, Rodovia Washington Luiz, Km 234, 13560-970 São Carlos, SP, Brazil.
  • Artur C DE Camargo
    Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária, Centro de Pesquisa de Pecuária do Sudeste, Rodovia Washington Luiz, Km 234, 13560-970 São Carlos, SP, Brazil.
  • Matteo Barbari
    University of Florence, Department of Agriculture, Food, Environment and Forestry, 50145, Via San Boneventura, 13, NA, 41012, Firenze, Italy.
  • Sergio C Brito
    DeLaval, Rod. Campinas-Mogi Mirim, Km 133,10, Roseira 13917-470 Jaguariúna, SP, Brazil.
  • Eduardo M B Reis
    Universidade Federal do Acre, Departamento de Ciências da Natureza, Rodovia BR 364, Km 04, nº 6637, Distrito Industrial, 69915-900 Rio Branco, AC, Brazil.
  • Flávio A Damasceno
    Universidade Federal de Lavras, Departamento de Engenharia, DEG, Campus UFLA, Trevo Rotatório Professor Edmir Sá, s/n, 37200-000 Lavras, MG, Brazil.
  • Esteffany Francisca R Nascimento
    Universidade Federal de Lavras, Departamento de Medicina Veterinária/DMV, Campus UFLA, Trevo Rotatório Professor Edmir Sá, s/n, 37200-000 Lavras, MG, Brazil.
  • Gianluca Bambi
    University of Florence, Department of Agriculture, Food, Environment and Forestry, 50145, Via San Boneventura, 13, NA, 41012, Firenze, Italy.