[Mitigating metal artifacts from cobalt-chromium alloy crowns in cone-beam CT images through deep learning techniques].

Journal: Zhonghua kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Zhonghua kouqiang yixue zazhi = Chinese journal of stomatology
PMID:

Abstract

To develop and evaluate metal artifact removal systems (MARS) based on deep learning to assess their effectiveness in removing artifacts caused by different thicknesses of metals in cone-beam CT (CBCT) images. A full-mouth standard model (60 mm×75 mm×110 mm) was three-dimensional (3D) printed using photosensitive resin. The model included a removable and replaceable target tooth position where cobalt-chromium alloy crowns with varying thicknesses were inserted to generate matched CBCT images. The artifacts resulting from cobalt-chromium alloys with different thicknesses were evaluated using the structural similarity index measure (SSIM) and peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR). CNN-MARS and U-net-MARS were developed using a convolutional neural network and U-net architecture, respectively. The effectiveness of both MARSs were assessed through visualization and by measuring SSIM and PSNR values. The SSIM and PSNR values were statistically analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (α=0.05). Significant differences were observed in the range of artifacts produced by different thicknesses of cobalt-chromium alloys (all <0.05), with 1 mm resulting in the least artifacts. The SSIM values for specimens with thicknesses of 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 mm were 0.916±0.019, 0.873±0.010, and 0.833±0.010, respectively (=447.89, <0.001). The corresponding PSNR values were 20.834±1.176, 17.002±0.427, and 14.673±0.429, respectively (=796.51, <0.001). After applying CNN-MARS and U-net-MARS to artifact removal, the SSIM and PSNR values significantly increased for images with the same thickness of metal (both <0.05). When using the CNN-MARS for artifact removal, the SSIM values for 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 mm were 0.938±0.023, 0.930±0.029, and 0.928±0.020 (=2.22, =0.112), while the PSNR values were 30.938±1.495, 30.578±2.154 and 30.553±2.355 (=0.54, =0.585). When using the U-net-MARS for artifact removal, the SSIM values for 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 mm were 0.930±0.024, 0.932±0.017 and 0.930±0.012 (=0.24, =0.788), and the PSNR values were 30.291±0.934, 30.351±1.002 and 30.271±1.143 (=0.07, =0.929). No significant differences were found in SSIM and PSNR values after artifact removal using CNN-MARS and U-net-MARS for different thicknesses of cobalt-chromium alloys (all >0.05). Visualization demonstrated a high degree of similarity between the images before and after artifact removal using both MARS. However, CNN-MARS displayed clearer metal edges and preserved more tissue details when compared with U-net-MARS. Both the CNN-MARS and U-net-MARS models developed in this study effectively remove the metal artifacts and enhance the image quality. CNN-MARS exhibited an advantage in restoring tissue structure information around the artifacts compared to U-net-MARS.

Authors

  • L H Jia
    Department of Prosthodontics, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Fujian Medical University & Fujian Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & Fujian Provincial Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterial & Stomatological Key Laboratory of Fujian College and University & Institute of Stomatology, Fujian Medical University & Research Center of Dental Esthetics and Biomechanics, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350002, China.
  • H L Lin
    Department of Prosthodontics, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Fujian Medical University & Fujian Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & Fujian Provincial Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterial & Stomatological Key Laboratory of Fujian College and University & Institute of Stomatology, Fujian Medical University & Research Center of Dental Esthetics and Biomechanics, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350002, China.
  • S W Zheng
    College of Computer and Data Science, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, China.
  • X J Lin
    Department of Prosthodontics, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Fujian Medical University & Fujian Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & Fujian Provincial Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterial & Stomatological Key Laboratory of Fujian College and University & Institute of Stomatology, Fujian Medical University & Research Center of Dental Esthetics and Biomechanics, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350002, China.
  • D Zhang
    College of Computer and Data Science, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, China.
  • H Yu
    School of Forensic Medicine, China Medical University, Shenyang 110001, China.