[Comparison of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal pelvic stones larger than 2.5 cm].

Journal: Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University

Published Date: Feb 20, 2016

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety, efficacy and complications of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy (LPL) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for treatment of renal pelvic stones larger than 2.5 cm.

Authors

Xiao-Yong Pu

Department of Urology, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Science, Guangzhou 510080, China. E-mail: pxyurol@163.com.
Jiu-Min Liu
Xue-Cheng Bi
Dong Li

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, 730030 Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Shang Huang
Yan-Hua Feng
Chu-Qi Lin

Keywords

Blood Transfusion Humans Intraoperative Complications Kidney Calculi Kidney Pelvis Laparoscopy Length of Stay Nephrostomy, Percutaneous Operative Time Postoperative Complications Treatment Outcome

External Resources

View on PubMed Access via DOI PubMed (28219872)

[Comparison of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal pelvic stones larger than 2.5 cm].

Abstract

Authors

Keywords

External Resources

Popular Topics

Recent Journals