Demystifying unsupervised learning: how it helps and hurts.

Journal: Trends in cognitive sciences
Published Date:

Abstract

Humans and machines rarely have access to explicit external feedback or supervision, yet manage to learn. Most modern machine learning systems succeed because they benefit from unsupervised data. Humans are also expected to benefit and yet, mysteriously, empirical results are mixed. Does unsupervised learning help humans or not? Here, we argue that the mixed results are not conflicting answers to this question, but reflect that humans self-reinforce their predictions in the absence of supervision, which can help or hurt depending on whether predictions and task align. We use this framework to synthesize empirical results across various domains to clarify when unsupervised learning will help or hurt. This provides new insights into the fundamentals of learning with implications for instruction and lifelong learning.

Authors

  • Franziska Bröker
    Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany; Gatsby Computational Neuroscience Unit, London, UK. Electronic address: franziska.broeker@tuebingen.mpg.de.
  • Lori L Holt
    Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA.
  • Brett D Roads
    Department of Computer Science, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, 80309-0430, USA. brett.roads@colorado.edu.
  • Peter Dayan
    Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany; University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
  • Bradley C Love
    1University College London, London, UK.